Nl10 Qq 16/03

Hey Allen,

I am not folding the flop, you have to calculate your equity on the Flop and therefore you have more equity than 33%. Your calculation is not good because you should calculate your equity when the money goes in. Not how the board runs out.

Best regards,
Gerv

Your calculation is not good because you should calculate your equity when the money goes in

sorry,i can not understand your mean,"3.06/8.65=35%"is wrong?

Originally posted by allen82082
sorry,i can not understand your mean,"3.06/8.65=35%"is wrong?

As far as I know, you need to use the pot size at the time you face your decision (6.74)

No you filled in the final board. you should fill in only the flop

Best regards,
Gerv

牌面：: T♥7♦6♣
           赢率       胜       和
MP1    41.49%  41.01%   0.48% { JJ-66, ATs }
BU     58.51%  58.03%   0.48% { QdQc }

Oh,absolutely i make a foolish mistake in prepost.
But i still want to know his range when him check/raise me?
88 99 are here?
zh.pokerstrategy.com
牌面：: Th7d6c
赢率 胜 和
MP1 51.99% 51.43% 0.56% { JJ-TT, 77-66, ATs, T9s, 76s }
BU 48.01% 47.44% 0.56% { QdQc }
This range i guess is comfortable.

I dont think he openraise/calls a suited connector.

I also think he does not have 66 but can have 77/TT. That said the amount of hands you are behind against is minimal so without deducing his range exactly one can say we have sufficient equity to go cbet/broke here

Best regards,
Gerv

That said the amount of hands you are behind against is minimal so without deducing his range exactly one can say we have sufficient equity to go cbet/broke here

Excuse me,Gerv,you mean i have to bet/fold here?

No bet/broke is bet/going broke which is a term for ''going all-in''

No bet/broke is bet/going broke which is a term for ''going all-in''

Ty~
But,Gerv can you show me his range and calculate the EV ?