Skip to forum
Notifications
Clear all

NL100 Q6o, 2pair freeplay vs fish

7 Posts
4 Users
0 Reactions
72 Views
axelphoney
Joined: 03.10.2009

Grabbed by Holdem Manager
NL Holdem $1(BB) Replayer
SB ($28)
Hero ($176)
UTG ($109)
UTG+1 ($124)
CO ($50)
BTN ($119)

Dealt to Hero 6♠ Q♦

fold, UTG+1 calls $1, fold, fold, SB calls $0.50, Hero checks

FLOP ($3) 9♠ Q♥ 6♣

SB bets $2, Hero raises to $8, UTG+1 raises to $14, SB folds, Hero raises to $48, UTG+1 raises to $123 (AI), Hero calls $75.82

villain: 51/2/2/48 (VPIP/PFR/AF/WTS) - ~100 hands

Think I may have overplayed this hand. I hadn't managed to get any reads on villain other than he seemd to be playing rather passive and very stationy (called down 3rd pair vs 3barrels amongst other things..).

So his raise here should def be for value, and I assume he would raise something like all twopairs, sets and then maybe also slowplayed KK-AA.


Bräda: Q♥9♣6♠
       Equity   Vinst  Oavgjort
MP2    45.97%  38.70%     7.27% { Q6s, Q6o }
MP3    54.03%  46.77%     7.27% { QQ+, 99, 66, Q9s, Q6s, 96s, Q9o, Q6o }

So we are a slight underdog, so getting in should not be that good.

If we assume he always raises QQ+ pre our equity will plunge even more:


Bräda: Q♥9♣6♠
       Equity   Vinst  Oavgjort
MP2    27.15%  13.72%    13.43% { Q6s, Q6o }
MP3    72.85%  59.42%    13.43% { 99, 66, Q9s, Q6s, 96s, Q9o, Q6o }

So maybe a good line would be to just call down here assuming he raises/bets one of the two ranges or something in between?

Getting it in was obv a mistake..


Reply
Quote
6 replies
greyboy
Joined: 19.07.2006

50/2 FISH WILL never raise pre AQ,KQ, QQ+, he will often run with his top pair in your two pair. Yoou have to go broke here.


Reply
Quote
axelphoney
Joined: 03.10.2009

I think that's a pretty strong assumption, although it could be it true it is by no means certain. And as for the toppairs I hadn't got any reads how he played those at this point, but I actually think most of these passive fish tend to play them rather passively.


Reply
Quote
DeLau
Joined: 10.01.2009

You should definitely add some bluffhands there. You give way too much credit to fish imo. Also he might go crazy and have 9x.

Not sure whether to call flop to keep in bluffs or get it in vs his valuerange. I would probably go for the all-in.


Reply
Quote
axelphoney
Joined: 03.10.2009

I really doubt a (seemingly) passive fish is ever bluffing here so I don't think I am giving him too much credit actually.


Reply
Quote
DeLau
Joined: 10.01.2009

Fish (also passive) have often baffled me when we get to showdown so I always add some bluffs (even if a little amount).

Obivously, you played with the guy, so you have a better feel for it. But in general, add bluffs imo.


Reply
Quote

I agree we just have to go broke here, I agree he can have AQ on the flop from the pf action (might not go this nutso with it post mind) no reason not to have 69 as well.

just pretty sigh to run into 66 or Q9 :(


Reply
Quote