Skip to forum
Notifications
Clear all

$22 double deuce 88

7 Posts
5 Users
0 Reactions
367 Views
Hlynkinn
Joined: 14.06.2008

1.7k/3.4k No Limit Holdem
9 Players
Hand Conversion Powered by weaktight.com
The $100K Double Deuce

Stacks:
UTG cb6365 (32k) 9bb
UTG+1 blackDonii (43k) 13bb
MP1 zlattee_ (68k) 20bb
MP2 drosen (46k) 13bb
MP3 S3calhar (67k) 20bb
CO LordPaprika (92k) 27bb
BTN Hlynkinn (53k) 16bb
SB AreOut (141k) 41bb
BB Dimasik59 (127k) 37bb

Blinds: 1.7k/3.4k Ante 400

Pre-Flop: (8.7k, 9 players) Hlynkinn is BTN 8♠ 8♦
3 folds, drosen goes all-in 45k, 2 folds, Hlynkinn goes all-in 53k, 2 folds

Flop: 2♠ 6♣ 10:spade: (100k, 2 players, 2 all-in)

Turn: Q♥ (100k, 2 players, 2 all-in)

River: 6♦ (100k, 2 players, 2 all-in)

Final Pot: 100k

Villain hasn't done anything note worthy... he seems decent. Doubt he'll be open shipping the top of his range here.


Reply
Quote
6 replies
TheRebuz
Joined: 12.10.2008

66/aq imo


Reply
Quote
gusma
Joined: 07.10.2007

std.

nothing else to do.


Reply
Quote

Originally posted by TheRebuz
66/aq imo

not sure if it is our isolation range or his shoving range :)
I would expect him to shove any pp and AT+, KJs+
I would isolate myself 66+, AJ+

best regards,


Reply
Quote
chenny8888
Joined: 03.10.2007

Hi all,

88 seems legit. I think we can perhaps take some of the top of his range out. I would not call 66, but 77+ AJ+ seems fine. 66+ AQ+ is not good BTW, AJ is a better hand than 66.


Reply
Quote
TheRebuz
Joined: 12.10.2008

Originally posted by chenny8888
Hi all,

88 seems legit. I think we can perhaps take some of the top of his range out. I would not call 66, but 77+ AJ+ seems fine. 66+ AQ+ is not good BTW, AJ is a better hand than 66.

Why 66< aj cos he is shoving Ax hands that we dominate??? We crush 22-55 a2-a6 and we flip vs a7+ with aj we r behind 22+/aq+ and we dominate only some combos of qj/ kj/ jt if he is shoving them to start with
Imo i 'm on the. Mob so cant do Eq how we run with 66 vs aj ( vs villains asumed shoving range) but I think 66 r better then aj


Reply
Quote
chenny8888
Joined: 03.10.2007

Hi all,

equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 49.570% 49.05% 00.52% 1194201996 12771594.00 { 66 }
Hand 1: 50.430% 49.91% 00.52% 1215151104 12771594.00 { 22+, A8s+, A5s-A2s, K9s+, QTs+, J9s+, T9s, 98s, ATo+, KJo+, QJo }

equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 51.401% 50.92% 00.48% 1239776940 11777196.00 { 77 }
Hand 1: 48.599% 48.12% 00.48% 1171564956 11777196.00 { 22+, A8s+, A5s-A2s, K9s+, QTs+, J9s+, T9s, 98s, ATo+, KJo+, QJo }

equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 51.514% 48.24% 03.27% 1992303372 135248364.00 { AJo }
Hand 1: 48.486% 45.21% 03.27% 1867277148 135248364.00 { 22+, A8s+, A5s-A2s, K9s+, QTs+, J9s+, T9s, 98s, ATo+, KJo+, QJo }

That's if he's shoving every pair, which isn't the greatest play with his stacksize.


Reply
Quote