Hey hakan,
Sorry it took this long to reply. Been keeping myself busy lately
Hand #1:
Given his pre size, I expect him to be more depolarized than normally. Hence, I don't mind 4betting small and calling it off in case he jams. But calling against such a tight guy is also fine. Leading flop isn't bad but the std line is to c/c. Turn, I like c/fing more since I don't think most regs on nl100 will be betting hands lime QQ/JJon the turn for value with the plan of calling off a shove. That's why I don't think you'll get much if any value by shoving the turn and you shut down all the potential bluffs villain could have. Also, I don't think there are that many draws you protect against by shoving, since villain's pre range is so tight.
#2:
Unless you know villain isn't bluffing enough with this line, I call down. Sure, on nl100 most guys who play 16/13 prly don't bluff much with this line, but without more info (especially his open range!) I can make the decision that he's not bluffing enough.
#3:
Pre is good.
On that dry flop i think he would bet smaller if he had an Ax type hand.
this is a very very brave assumption to make. In general, I dislike making such statements/reads, without a lot of proof that this is actually the case. Don't project your own logic into your opponents! That said, flop is fine. Turn, it's close between betting and checking, since you clearly have showdown value with nut no pair. Once you get c/called on this turn, I think I prefer giving up river over betting. You block the Qx/KK/JJ types of hands that might c/c this turn and you don't block any of the Ax that could c/c turn (weak Ax). Hence, I prefer giving up with this hand.
Regarding, "who's range this board hits better" the answer is it hits villain's range better but not by a huge amount.