Skip to forum
Notifications
Clear all

big 162$ last 11

8 Posts
5 Users
0 Reactions
824 Views
TheRebuz
Joined: 12.10.2008

PokerStars - $150+$12|2000/4000 Ante 500 NL - Holdem - 5 players
Hand converted by PokerTracker 4

BTN: 467,697 (VPIP: 21.95, PFR: 16.67, 3Bet Preflop: 8.93, Hands: 123)
SB: 122,966 (VPIP: 14.45, PFR: 11.74, 3Bet Preflop: 7.39, Hands: 537)
Hero (BB): 67,095
UTG: 153,067 (VPIP: 20.44, PFR: 14.71, 3Bet Preflop: 4.92, Hands: 140)
CO: 144,020 (VPIP: 20.69, PFR: 21.43, 3Bet Preflop: 14.29, Hands: 29)

5 players post ante of 500, SB posts SB 2,000, Hero posts BB 4,000

Pre Flop: (pot: 8,500) Hero has T♥ T♣

fold, CO raises to 8,000, BTN raises to 16,000, SB raises to 36,888,Hero???

this is second time 3betor is beting Co with same siizng in same spot, BTn las kinda loose

SB is solid,
what range do we get it in here?


Reply
Quote
7 replies
onetwo78
Joined: 06.07.2010

it is a tough decision, but I think we should fold it.


Reply
Quote
letmewinplz8
Joined: 15.05.2010

I also agree with folding am not quite sure what to get in though is QQ+/AK too tight?


Reply
Quote

QQ+, AK seems too tight. I would likely go with JJ+, AK
TT is also fold to me.

best regards,


Reply
Quote
letmewinplz8
Joined: 15.05.2010

Originally posted by Kaitz20
QQ+, AK seems too tight. I would likely go with JJ+, AK
TT is also fold to me.

best regards,

Yea thats originally the range I wanted to say


Reply
Quote
chenny8888
Joined: 03.10.2007

Hi all,

Not sure what SB's range is, and I think we should be wary of both BU and CO's ranges too. QQ+ AK seems extremely reasonable, and AK is only there because it is an amazing bluff hand given its blockers to AA/KK.


Reply
Quote
TheRebuz
Joined: 12.10.2008

Originally posted by chenny8888
Hi all,

Not sure what SB's range is, and I think we should be wary of both BU and CO's ranges too. QQ+ AK seems extremely reasonable, and AK is only there because it is an amazing bluff hand given its blockers to AA/KK.

jj=tt??


Reply
Quote
chenny8888
Joined: 03.10.2007

SB could have some combinations of TT here, and all combinations of JJ. So I think JJ >>> TT.


Reply
Quote