Rihard 2014-2016 with BrokeSoBroke

Sorry for not posting. Been busy grinding.

Practicing my psychic abilities.

$0.05/$0.10 Zoom No Limit Holdem
PokerStars
6 Players
Hand Conversion Powered by weaktight.com

Stacks:
UTG ($10.11) 101bb
Rihard4a (UTG+1) ($10.49) 105bb
CO ($10) 100bb
BTN ($70.66) 707bb
SB ($17.98) 180bb
BB ($10.39) 104bb

Pre-Flop: ($0.15, 6 players) Rihard4a is UTG+1 6♦ 6♠
1 fold, Rihard4a raises to $0.27, 1 fold, BTN calls $0.27, 1 fold, BB raises to $1.30, Rihard4a calls $1.03, BTN folds

Flop: Q♠ A♦ 6♥ ($2.92, 2 players)
BB bets $1.50, Rihard4a calls $1.50

Turn: 6♣ ($5.92, 2 players)
BB checks, Rihard4a bets $1.20, BB calls $1.20

River: 3♥ ($8.32, 2 players)
BB checks, Rihard4a says "ohhhh KK probably hahahaahaha", Rihard4a goes all-in $6.49, BB goes all-in $6.39

Final Pot: $21.10
BB shows two pair, Kings and Sixes
K♦ K♣
Rihard4a shows four of a kind, Sixes
6♦ 6♠

Rihard4a wins $20.25 (net +$9.76)

BTN lost $0.27
BB lost $10.39

Soon 25NL. ♠_grin:

Pretty awesome graph.

The 66 hand, are you simply setmining on that spot? If so, do you think you are getting the odds for that?

66 seems like a very marginal call at best to me pre.

But yeah, nice graph

Move up and stop stealing my bb

Gl on the shot though

if the BB is squeezing tight (like premiums only) and BU is passive, then flatting 66 there is a must in my opinion...

and awesome graph obviously

Nice to see other people from Latvia doing well in poker.

Jeez man, that is some graph - well done !!!!!!!!!!!

Iespaidīgi Good Job!

dont slack with the update, would like to see another crazy graph!

I'm now on holidays in Riga, don't have much time to do much updating. I drop in time to time to see the forums and then got my stuff to do. Maybe later will do some update.

Nice redline!

Have fun in Riga, visited Riga myself last year

Hey followers ♦

Anyone who is in Riga wants to go Paintballin'? Contact me and we can figure something out.

Rihard

Originally posted by vuciitis
if the BB is squeezing tight (like premiums only) and BU is passive, then flatting 66 there is a must in my opinion...

and awesome graph obviously I think it's quite clearly -EV to flat 66 in this spot. Even if you can put villain on such a tight range and expect to get stacks everytime it's still -EV. 10:1 implieds just simply isn't enough.

Maybe I will be updating soon. So stay tuned. #blogz

Originally posted by fusionpk

Originally posted by vuciitis
if the BB is squeezing tight (like premiums only) and BU is passive, then flatting 66 there is a must in my opinion...

and awesome graph obviously I think it's quite clearly -EV to flat 66 in this spot. Even if you can put villain on such a tight range and expect to get stacks everytime it's still -EV. 10:1 implieds just simply isn't enough.

Of course. You've learned very well what Pokerstrategy has taught you!

Great progress Rihard! Can't wait to see the blog update. Must be busto!

BSB

Originally posted by BrokesoBroke

Originally posted by fusionpk

Originally posted by vuciitis
if the BB is squeezing tight (like premiums only) and BU is passive, then flatting 66 there is a must in my opinion...

and awesome graph obviously I think it's quite clearly -EV to flat 66 in this spot. Even if you can put villain on such a tight range and expect to get stacks everytime it's still -EV. 10:1 implieds just simply isn't enough.

Of course. You've learned very well what Pokerstrategy has taught you!

Great progress Rihard! Can't wait to see the blog update. Must be busto!

BSB

What you mean BSB, Pokerstrategy is brainwashing us with theory? I feel ther's somewhat leveling, which he will not reveal obv. ♦

Not much of the theory is the best play at NL10. The last hand is one of the examples of bullsh-t people do at microstakes when they are encouraged to.

Originally posted by BrokesoBroke

Originally posted by fusionpk

Originally posted by vuciitis
if the BB is squeezing tight (like premiums only) and BU is passive, then flatting 66 there is a must in my opinion...

and awesome graph obviously I think it's quite clearly -EV to flat 66 in this spot. Even if you can put villain on such a tight range and expect to get stacks everytime it's still -EV. 10:1 implieds just simply isn't enough.

Of course. You've learned very well what Pokerstrategy has taught you!

Great progress Rihard! Can't wait to see the blog update. Must be busto!

BSB

Could you explain, why and how is flatting 66 EP vs BB profitable, especialy in a sqz pot 100bb?

Originally posted by BrokesoBroke

Originally posted by fusionpk

Originally posted by vuciitis
if the BB is squeezing tight (like premiums only) and BU is passive, then flatting 66 there is a must in my opinion...

and awesome graph obviously I think it's quite clearly -EV to flat 66 in this spot. Even if you can put villain on such a tight range and expect to get stacks everytime it's still -EV. 10:1 implieds just simply isn't enough.

Of course. You've learned very well what Pokerstrategy has taught you!

Great progress Rihard! Can't wait to see the blog update. Must be busto!

BSB

Nice attitude, it's also nice of you to judge someone w/o even knowing them, assuming I'm some NL10 pokerstrategy robot. Anyway clearly you can't be wrong so i'll just leave you to teach your stakee how to make -EV calls. Considering how high you actually play it's quite shocking that you can't even believe that this is -EV.

Inb4 all the "we can win at showdown bs" 10:1 isn't enough period. You hit 1 in 8ish, you are assuming you get stacks every single time you hit (not true) you are forgetting the times you get set over set or board runs out shocking etc. We can't take our pair to SD if you have already assumed that his range is just nuts blabla yada yada.

Used to actually like your rail and was routing for you to catch EV when you had that tough time, how silly of me. Great of you to be sarcastic to someone who was trying to help someone who you have financial interest in. I could understand if it was some NL10 grinder spouting BS....

#rant