If his range qq+ ak it clearly -ev to flat even if we stack his tp+ every time we hit. Unless he ch/F every single time with AK, when did not hit and we know that.
Originally posted by fusionpk
Originally posted by BrokesoBroke
Originally posted by fusionpk
Originally posted by vuciitis
if the BB is squeezing tight (like premiums only) and BU is passive, then flatting 66 there is a must in my opinion...and awesome graph obviously
I think it's quite clearly -EV to flat 66 in this spot. Even if you can put villain on such a tight range and expect to get stacks everytime it's still -EV. 10:1 implieds just simply isn't enough.
Of course. You've learned very well what Pokerstrategy has taught you!
![]()
Great progress Rihard! Can't wait to see the blog update. Must be busto!
BSB
Nice attitude, it's also nice of you to judge someone w/o even knowing them, assuming I'm some NL10 pokerstrategy robot. Anyway clearly you can't be wrong so i'll just leave you to teach your stakee how to make -EV calls. Considering how high you actually play it's quite shocking that you can't even believe that this is -EV.
Inb4 all the "we can win at showdown bs" 10:1 isn't enough period. You hit 1 in 8ish, you are assuming you get stacks every single time you hit (not true) you are forgetting the times you get set over set or board runs out shocking etc. We can't take our pair to SD if you have already assumed that his range is just nuts blabla yada yada.
Used to actually like your rail and was routing for you to catch EV when you had that tough time, how silly of me. Great of you to be sarcastic to someone who was trying to help someone who you have financial interest in. I could understand if it was some NL10 grinder spouting BS....
#rant
Originally posted by BrokesoBroke
Poker Is Awesome!
can u please leave your toughts on this despite the bullshit flying your way?
tnx in advance!
Originally posted by vuciitis
Originally posted by BrokesoBroke
Poker Is Awesome!can u please leave your toughts on this despite the bullshit flying your way?
tnx in advance!
The villain obviously has mega leaks that were never posted so the argument from all parts is pretty silly with incomplete information.
He did cbet KK on an AQ flop...
Originally posted by jules97
The villain obviously has mega leaks that were never posted so the argument from all parts is pretty silly with incomplete information.He did cbet KK on an AQ flop...
AND c/c it down later
Originally posted by Tomaloc
Originally posted by jules97
The villain obviously has mega leaks that were never posted so the argument from all parts is pretty silly with incomplete information.He did cbet KK on an AQ flop...
AND c/c it down later
(gulps) Sounds like somebody I might know!
I may be terrible but I can't work out how 66 could be +ev to call.
#brainwashedbylnternet
Originally posted by oblioo
Rihard no longer owes me anything from our deal; thanks for trying.
Yes Rihard is a good guy. Thanks for working hard and repaying oblioo.
