Skip to forum
Notifications
Clear all

NL4 6max 27082014 - 99 bluff river

6 Posts
3 Users
0 Reactions
1,197 Views
faronel
Joined: 13.07.2011

PartyGaming - $0.04 NL (6 max) - Holdem - 6 players
Hand converted by PokerTracker 3

BTN: $3.09
SB: $4.00
Hero (BB): $5.14
UTG: $3.93
MP: $5.07
CO: $3.30

SB posts SB $0.02, Hero posts BB $0.04

Pre Flop: ($0.06) Hero has 9♥ 9♠

UTG calls $0.04, fold, fold, fold, SB calls $0.02, Hero checks

Flop: ($0.12, 3 players) Q♣ 7♥ 4♦
SB checks, Hero checks, UTG checks

Turn: ($0.12, 3 players) 6♥
SB bets $0.12, Hero calls $0.12, fold

River: ($0.36, 2 players) 5♠
SB bets $0.17, Hero raises to $0.86, fold

Hero wins $0.67

villain
VPIP 19/ PFR9 - 266hands, WTSD 28%

Would you bluff this spot as played? I put villain on Qx, maybe 7x, two pair combos here.


Reply
Quote
5 replies

Hello

Well the first thing that I would do is a standard OR against limpers so something like 4x.

Now to comment the line that you have taken.
I think that the fact that he is a tight player and that he has a low WTSD he surelly has a Qx hand maybe even 2pair but the board got way to scary for him OTR.

If I had more info on him like some reads sure I would bluff why not because as I said his most likely holding is Qx. And the fact that you checked when the board was relatively dry and then called a pot sized bet when it got a lot more drawy and OTR many draws complete and you can even see it by his bet sizing that he wanted to save that 1 cent in case you got a straight.

And you could easily have it since you just check from BB which means any 2 cards basicly.

So ye I think it was a good bluff since there are a lot of things that make you able to represent a straight.


Reply
Quote

What about the bluff sizing? Wouldn't 60c be enough?

EDIT: If he had a strong Qx, wouldn't he lead out the flop?


Reply
Quote

I think that even 50c would do.

About that other question, I totally forgot to think about that. Well either way he played a Qx wierd or he might got a FD OTT and wanted to semi bluff and I guess tried to represent a straight OTR.

But I think that I would fold OTT (unless I would have a read that he rarely has it when he bets pot) since our hand is basicly a bluff catcher and it worked this time but I don't think that it would work often enough.


Reply
Quote
faronel
Joined: 13.07.2011

Thank you for the input.

For the given villain's stats, flop check in a free play pot/turn pot size lead me think Q with low/medium kicker (Q9s, Q8s?) that he didn't dare to lead out against UTG limp on flop or two pair completion on turn (65, 64?).

Did not put villain on a pure flush draw. FD+something maybe, but what then (Q8+hh?). River block bet seemed like an indication of a hand that villain does not perceive to be very strong and hopes for a cheap showdown with a worse hand in hero's hands.

Agree regarding turn - could have folded. But that was the plan: call and bluff river, if I get low non-heart card. :f_p:


Reply
Quote

Well I am currently not on that lvl of planning yet you know and I learned about blocking bets today, but participation here makes me learn I think.

BTW currently playing 2NL but I think I am on a good way to understanding the game more and more day by day :), thats why I am participating on your threads :) I express my thinking if a am wrong even better I learn even more.


Reply
Quote