Jj Nl100

I am not so sure about your range estimation

what makes you thin he plays all AQ kombos like that? I think that would be a rather optimistic shove on the river - also w KK honestly

Imo he can be value shoving AQ since UTG perceived call 3bet range has no or very few Tx, and KK+ is mostly 4bet especially vs wide 3bet. But who knows if he cbets AQ, AK, AJ at all on flop. Postflop he looks definetely on tigther side especially on turn, so imo it is easy fold on turn. Also on blank, easy fold on turn vs this guy.

well just because we rarely have him beat is not a reason to valuebet if we only ever call when we do have him beat
do you know what i mean?
what weaker hands than AQ call the riverbet? Is that range all that big?
I dont think so

Sure I understand what you mean, and I agree. But not all regs think with a totally clear head while playing multi tables.

so does that mean that you assume he always shoves AQ? and has all 12 combos of it?

I think JJ with is a clear fold river because we block Fd, AJ, KJ ...

I think we may call river with AQ and some JJ combo without :spade:.

About PF range villain, I think he will more times calls with AQ than 3bet. (my opinion)

Originally posted by bulldozzer7
so does that mean that you assume he always shoves AQ? and has all 12 combos of it?

Apsolutely not. He might even not 3bet AQ. I just wanted to say it is possible that he bets it for value.

I am concording with Ginger, with AQ we have a clear value bet on the river.

Hey guys,

I think JJ is a fold on the river. I would fold. Imo even the turn call is close facing this action.

However...I would seriously consider value betting AQ (even with small sizing) because I think a lot of guys are not folding JJ here. It partly depends on preflop range also (we should possibly check if villain is flatting stuff like KK/AA vs 3bet and has more of a protected range.