Great stuff!
Watched the video which I will get back to in a minute but some stuff about 1st hand.
I agree about their raising limp ranges, most guys would raise any Kxs in such spot BVB, I am surprised that even on higher stakes people don't include at least some % of them in their check range pre flop. What do you think about Jxs 9xs 8xs and all the lower suited hands pre flop? Do you feel that pre flop he raises those as well or has them in check range? If he has them in check range then post flop he has FD more often then he doesn't of course. On flop of course he then has tons of bluffs in his range mostly (BDFDs or 2nd,3rd pairs) . How sure are you that he might not raise flop with very weak flush IP, cause this can change EV of your play a bit. So turn play becomes significantly easier to play because if he doesn't raise flushes flop, he certainly doesn't have any Ax in his range (all of them are ISO pre flop?) and your turn play is standard value play. You only use vs stronger Tx (which he would ISO pre flop most likely) and loose to T5,T4 2 pair type of hands. He will still try to bluff you on turn feeling that A and flush that got there are great cards for his range but in reality he has weaker Tx , FDs, SDs and very little value.
The most interesting part about the hand is that you x/r turn from 20$ to 106$ which seems like a overkill and bluff which is probably what made him 3 bet you on turn trying to take it down. Great thing was that you were level above him and probably figured it out that to massive x/r turn he would more likely try to bluff then vs say 50$ or 60$. Also you didn't want to give him good prize for his draws and made him stack of with weaker hand to such sizing. Really well done job on the turn, you owned him 
Can you talk about what you expected in his turn raising range, why you choose such sizing? Do you balance this play out for value or do this exploitably vs this particular opponent who you have reads would be aggressive in such spots? Your adjustment if turn doesn't complete a flush - do you continue bluff catching by river expecting that he would bluff enough combos after he raised the flop ?
KK hand in 3 bet pot was very interesting and also very common spot. Things you mentioned in your video I have been thinking about for past month or so heavily. There is so many board textures and run outs where opponent will simply in practice be over folding that 3 barrel bluffing becomes very +EV in general. In this particular texture opponent never assigns you any sets except on the river perhaps (if you 3 bet QQ vs EP as mixed strategy or merged 3 bet range but he can also have QQ in his flat to 3 bet pre flop). The only real value hands that you have is 4 combos of flopped straight and 4 more JTs (if you use it in 3bet pre flop) which gets there on the river + 98s 3 combos , total 11 combos of clear value really. So if he has any set it makes sense for him to play it the way he did and extract maximum value since you also have KK and AA which I feel is profitable call if he has bluffing frequency on river (missed flushes and straights or turning 8x or gutter into a bluff which has no showdown value). The question here is, would you protect your river check range with some of the 11 combos of value or not? If you don't then he can always know you either have bluffs or bluff catcher never straight or set which potentially is very bad if he picks up on it. So I feel in those spots it will be very difficult to balance, cause by not betting your value hands you loose tons of value vs hands that he might call such as TT and JJ that he might not potentially turn into a bluff when you check, but if you check he gets away in a way that he can bet only strong value river and check all the rest
Your explanations are superb about PTSR in such spots and I have been in doubt about such things for past 10 days or so. I read and studied that 2 tone or flops with two flush cards are not textures that we want to value bet massively with the reasons of getting paid by flush draws because on such textures we are never very strong favorites but we should rather think about other hands in opponents range that we beat. So in this case opponent can have TT and JJ which he pays of 2 streets for sure as well as gutters 77 66 and those are pretty much only things that we get paid off 2 streets along with FDs that he calls IP. Since this is his calling range 2 streets, with what frequency would you say that he calls his FDs flop and turn? Does he have some of FDs in flop calling, turn raising range ? It would help a lot to determine his actual river range. Goes without saying that AK calls flop, folds to double barrel here unless he has reads that you are very bluff have and he has a spade blocker. AQ and AJ call flop, fold turn, KQs is the same in such spots.
So his range when he calls 2 streets is capped to either very strong hands (2 pairs +) or draws (fds with just some sds but it is less likely, more fds then sds of course) + some bluff catchers (TT,JJ, 66 77 from which he folds 66 on the turn or even flop most likely cause of reverse implieds). So the range he gets to river is not bluff heavy enough and your bluff catch purely depends on what his tendency will be with his bluff catchers that are now showdown value (JJ TT, 77) as well as busted FDs (very few Ax ones. So it generally seems to me that bluff catching this river is -EV play because he needs to turn hands into bluff and if he doesn't do that you loose full stack in such spot.
This was such a great analysis from you, thank you for it, it just cleared my doubts about playing over pair on flush type textures with draws when we are never really ahead vs his range that calls down 2 streets.
Questions!
On NL5k, or anywhere from NL200+, what do you feel is general tendency of V in such a spot when you check to him?
How would this hand be played differently if you were IP vs EP? Would you now lean more towards betting less and pot controlling vs building the pot and pricing yourself to make river +EV x/c like in illustrated example?
Can you introduce yourself a bit, maybe not birth certificate and such but stuff like how long you have been playing and your road in general? I feel it would be super useful and motivating especially for people who will see you as an idol and follow your footsteps.
The part about giving away edges and secrets, I somewhat agree with you. Coaching is always +EV because you as player develop multiple angles to approach a certain topic and by doing that and teaching others you teach yourself a lot in the process. The thing about high limits and good opponents, it seems that who ever works more and is better at constantly readjusting, he will make most money in the long run.
I am curious at what point of your poker journey was it most difficult for you to bridge that gap of uncertainty about your plays vs tougher field etc?
I hope you continue to post hands and videos, I am very grateful to what you have done so far and once all the best with your challenge this year it seems like you will crush it easily!
P.S. Get some status going so that you can post graphs and connect via community tool for Skype conversations and such
) So Wed and thursday grind and no training.