Poker Stars, $0.02/$0.05 No Limit Hold'em Cash, 6 Players
Poker Tools Powered By Holdem Manager - The Ultimate Poker Software Suite.
SB: $2.51 (50.2 bb)
Hero (BB): $5 (100 bb)
UTG: $5.31 (106.2 bb)
MP: $7.17 (143.4 bb)
CO: $5 (100 bb)
BTN: $5 (100 bb)
Preflop: Hero is BB with 8
5![]()
4 folds, SB completes, Hero checks
Flop: ($0.10) 6
J
Q
(2 players)
SB checks, Hero checks
Turn: ($0.10) 7
(2 players)
SB bets $0.10, Hero calls $0.10
River: ($0.30) 4
(2 players)
SB checks, Hero bets $0.17, SB raises to $0.65, Hero folds
Results: $0.64 pot ($0.03 rake)
Final Board: 6
J
Q
7
4
SB mucked and won $0.61 ($0.29 net)
Hero mucked 8
5
and lost (-$0.32 net)
The villain is unknown. I have only three hands on him.
This hand kinda boggles me. On the flop, I check behind for a free card, hoping to hit something, preferably a flush. OTT I pick some more equity, having an OESD to go with my flush draw. With 15 outs and about 30% equity, the turn call is a no brainer, even if it was a pot-sized bet. OTR I get the flush and I bet small, hoping to get value from some Jx or Qx.
I don't understand his raise, however, because it fits with nothing. He pots the turn. If he tells the truth, then I should see 77 in his hand. But it wouldn't raise the river. In fact, nothing would raise the river except for slowplayed A♦:x:diamond: . But what A♦:x:diamond: would bet that big in the turn?
Have I been bluffed here? Does the acronym in which if you don't understand a guy's line then he never bluffs in that spot apply here too?