NL2 SH, nut FD vs flop raise

I do not think KQ are raising that big on flop.

Just call the flop, mate or at least reconsider what's the purpose of raising weak hands (as u mentioned u don't expect he was holding even TP)

Considering his whole range on the flop, I expect decent FE. His small bet, probably means weakness.
Sure, calling is fine, vs 1/2 pot CB I would be more inclined to do so.

What is his cbetting range on flop?

I think he would probably c-bet bigger with draws (not to many of those anyway, only 67s and QhJh), and his value range - Kx, AA, QQ-99, sets.
He may even c-bet bigger with air. So, my guess would be, that he c-bets like this mostly 66-77, 8x.

As far as FE goes for the flop raise - who knows. Maybe he folds 1/2 of the time, and I`m fine with that.

I think that the hand is somewhere between being strong enough for raising for value and being to weak for raising for value, thus we can call it. It is certainly too strong for raising as a bluff. So, if we decided to raise this hand, I think we should at least call his 3bet, but I would just call the flop and plan to call the turn unimproved (or raise if we hit). If we call the turn unimproved, we can raise the river if we hit or, if we miss, we can bet the river unimproved if he desides to check.

I would call flop too. But was trying to see the reasons of Hero.

I prefer call flop. If you raise you should have a plan what to do and raise/folding is probably not good with our hand.

After the raise we can still call.

Originally posted by Ales851
I prefer call flop. If you raise you should have a plan what to do and raise/folding is probably not good with our hand.

This

Additionaly I preffer flat because you have JUST nut fd not combo draw, and if he has not Kx you can easily take down the pot on another streets

Many players fall into this trap - holding a nut FD and they go crazy.
It is true that there is a backfoor SD too but sd you look at it tight now you have a mot that strong Axs hand.