AA utg+1

bet/fold the flop instead of checking.

it's a flop that is fine to c/f imo as well with multiple oponents we are never good here. good choice of line mate!

c/f aces on that board seems a bit uhm, weak and very exploitable.

Villains can call both with broadways and stuff that they will fold on a cbet.

We can cbet here. Board is drawy and we can fold vs aggression.

Originally posted by Trommelboy
c/f aces on that board seems a bit uhm, weak and very exploitable.

Villains can call both with broadways and stuff that they will fold on a cbet.

Villains never know what are u folding

and about the hand:

I also like to make a check and see what happens and when such shit happens I think we have no other choice than fold , so WP

What eq do we need to valuebet? it's 50% right? vs 3 random ranges (100% ranges) we got 45,93% what will happend when we reduce those ranges to more precise ranges? Dosen't we need to win 50% of the time to breakeven with betting here? Sure it might feel weak to fold here, and it would be a diffrent spot if it was a 3w pott or headsup pott. If we give our villians a range of 99-55, AJs-A8s, K8s+, Q8s+, J8s+, T7s+, 97s+, 87s, AQo-A6o, K6o+, Q4o+, J4o+, T4o+, 94o+, 84o+, 74o+, 64o+, 54o (a range of 54,15%) then we have 39,39% eq.

If we would be in HU and villain was very agro, I think x/c can be OK since it will be difficult to play our hand vs raise. In 3way I expect villains to play more honestly and I think we can b/f to don´t give a free card to two ranges.