Skip to forum
Notifications
Clear all

Full house on river on wet board

6 Posts
6 Users
1 Reactions
621 Views
churchilland
Joined: 26.01.2011

When something like that happens i usually shove, cause in case if they have flush they will call and it seems the most profitable move...

Poker Stars, $0.01/$0.02 No Limit Hold'em Cash, 6 Players
Poker Tools Powered By Holdem Manager - The Ultimate Poker Software Suite.

SB: $1.98 (99 bb)
BB: $2 (100 bb)
UTG: $2.66 (133 bb)
MP: $1.66 (83 bb)
CO: $3.35 (167.5 bb)
Hero (BTN): $2 (100 bb)

Preflop: Hero is BTN with 2 2
2 folds, CO calls $0.02, Hero raises to $0.06, 2 folds, CO calls $0.04

Flop: ($0.15) A 9 J (2 players)
CO checks, Hero checks

Turn: ($0.15) J (2 players)
CO checks, Hero checks

River: ($0.15) 2 (2 players)
CO bets $0.06, Hero raises to $1.94 and is all-in, CO calls $1.88

Results:

Spoiler

$4.03 pot ($0.14 rake)
Final Board: A 9 J J 2
CO showed A J and won $3.89 ($1.89 net)
Hero showed 2 2 and lost (-$2 net)


Reply
Quote
5 replies
Pnnkaznk
Joined: 13.11.2009

I wuld just call preflop, and raise only 3x at river. As played Most often he will not have anything strong on river to call all in.


Reply
Quote
lkdr9494
Joined: 26.01.2012

Damn what a bust :f_o:
I'd probably would have done what you did in this situation. I've gotten some stacks this way.
He slow-played it hoping you'd get the flush, but you got better, sadly not the best hand. It happens, we get outplayed sometimes.


Reply
Quote
nitrol
Joined: 24.07.2010

A flush would have bet on earlier streets.


Reply
Quote
la55i
Joined: 27.01.2013

That's the problem with very passive players. They can have the nuts and still don't bet them.


Reply
Quote
Alleen86
Joined: 27.05.2010

Maybe we could just call preflop, depending on his fold to flop cbet percentage. I don't see many worse hands that Jx which are calling our river shove. Ax is probably not calling and he most likelly doesn't have a flush, considering how passive he was on the flop/turn. Maybe we could raise to $0,30-$0,40 and get more value in the long run.


Reply
Quote