Skip to forum
Someone explain thi...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Someone explain this too me, please

46 Posts
11 Users
5 Reactions
9,101 Views
la55i
Joined: 27.01.2013

I think you should 3bet this 55 pre flop vs CO. Your SB vs CO 3bet range should be like 22-55, some suited connectors, JJ+, AK,AQs. There you have value and bluff 3bet range. If villain has high fold to 3bet you can 3bet even wider range. Otherwise that hand is well played. BB is short stack and will call pretty much anything, CO can have strong draws, 2 pair, TP + BDFD, overpairs and maybe even 33 which you beat? Villain must be very very tight for you to be able to fold this hand.

I think the best thing about software is that you can improve your own game with it. You will see your own stats and see if you for example fold too much to cbets or do not 3bet enough. Without software you can't identify your leaks easily and fix them.


Reply
Quote
Svinhugg
Joined: 20.08.2013

My point was that it is many good players even on NL2 so you should respect unknowns. Especially with big stacks.

By the way ..why do you sit with such a big stack? You get very vulnerable if you're not solid enough. The one I have 600 hands on has a bb/100 of 40 on my readings so he propably don't be to hurt if he runs into a bad beat.

Personally I have a tendency to tilt not only on bad beats but on good beats too. I start to take risks I shouldn't take. Actually one of my best leakfixer was to start to take a short break when I have made a big winning. When I come back to the tables a few minutes later I'm still in good mood but doesn't loose my head in the same way.


Reply
Quote
zzizek
Joined: 27.08.2008

I don't know. Maybe it's that powerful thing to not to pull winnings, only to rebuy (strategy)

"The one I have 600 hands on has a bb/100 of 40 "

What's that? Don't understand.

You're true about breaks. I FELT I should have one. It was too mechanical, too life-less, too much pressure builded already, everything.. perahps greed.. gotta take break from greed:)


Reply
Quote
la55i
Joined: 27.01.2013

The one I have 600 hands on has a bb/100 of 40

This means that Svinhugg has seen the villain in 600 hands. In these hands villains winrate is 40 big blinds per 100 hands. Meaning that in those 600 hands villain has won 240bb. This means that he probably is not a bad player.

Of course 600 hands is way too small sample to tell villains winrate but at least he hasn't lost money in the hands we have seen him.


Reply
Quote
Svinhugg
Joined: 20.08.2013

Originally posted by la55i

The one I have 600 hands on has a bb/100 of 40

This means that Svinhugg has seen the villain in 600 hands. In these hands villains winrate is 40 big blinds per 100 hands. Meaning that in those 600 hands villain has won 240bb. This means that he probably is not a bad player.

Of course 600 hands is way too small sample to tell villains winrate but at least he hasn't lost money in the hands we have seen him.

Exactly. And there are surprisingly many of those on NL2.

But one have to be careful when using data. Any moron can be lucky for a couple hundred of hands.

(Thats my hands for the last two days)


Reply
Quote
zzizek
Joined: 27.08.2008

Great, guys. Thank you.


Reply
Quote