Skip to forum
Notifications
Clear all

river spot in rush poker w deeper stacks

14 Posts
9 Users
0 Reactions
2,470 Views
briccius
Joined: 26.06.2007

Full Tilt No-Limit Hold'em, $0.25 BB (6 handed) - Full Tilt Converter Tool from http://www.flopturnriver.com

BB ($44.31)
Hero (UTG) ($95.83)
MP ($30.69)
CO ($63.79)
Button ($78.19)
SB ($48.93)

Preflop: Hero is UTG with J, 10
Hero raises to $0.75, MP calls $0.75, 2 folds, SB calls $0.65, 1 fold

Flop: ($2.50) 3, J, K (3 players)
SB checks, Hero bets $1.50, 1 fold, SB raises to $5.75, Hero calls $4.25

Turn: ($14) 2 (2 players)
SB bets $9.75, Hero calls $9.75

River: ($33.50) 2 (2 players)
SB bets $32.68 (All-In), Hero?

No stats or reads on opponent, except that he was 1-tabling.


Reply
Quote
13 replies
Ciufciuf5
Joined: 15.06.2013

this is a close spot and I think it needs some equilab calculation but I'm on mobile so can't do it. He can have some missed draws, diamonds, AQ or QTs but the flop hits a lot his flat range too, Kx and 33. I think folding here is ok.


Reply
Quote
nitrol
Joined: 24.07.2010

We cannot call here. All villains hands that xr flopare beating us. And our hand is not worth 4 streets...


Reply
Quote
Dadramel
Joined: 10.08.2014

You might have been drawing dead already otf. Open JT on UTG is marginal, to say the least.


Reply
Quote
Jaissica
Joined: 10.02.2009

Cant be drawing dead as if the villain has a flush draw he cannot have a pair and we are in front.

Good spot to level the flop AI and see if you can push the villain off AK or an overpair. If not its a flip.


Reply
Quote
Tinsley15
Joined: 18.07.2013

x back flop? anyone?


Reply
Quote
Dadramel
Joined: 10.08.2014

Originally posted by Jaissica
Cant be drawing dead as if the villain has a flush draw he cannot have a pair and we are in front.

It doesn't apply to the whole idea of another :diamond: that villain has certainly wished for. AQs beats our middle pair in terms of odds.

Originally posted by Tinsley15
x back flop? anyone?

Playing against two, having initiative, it'd be shame to lose it imo.


Reply
Quote
DREAMC4T
Joined: 13.10.2009

Originally posted by briccius
Full Tilt No-Limit Hold'em, $0.25 BB (6 handed) - Full Tilt Converter Tool from http://www.flopturnriver.com

BB ($44.31)
Hero (UTG) ($95.83)
MP ($30.69)
CO ($63.79)
Button ($78.19)
SB ($48.93)

Preflop: Hero is UTG with J, 10
Hero raises to $0.75, MP calls $0.75, 2 folds, SB calls $0.65, 1 fold

Flop: ($2.50) 3, J, K (3 players)
SB checks, Hero bets $1.50, 1 fold, SB raises to $5.75, Hero calls $4.25

Turn: ($14) 2 (2 players)
SB bets $9.75, Hero calls $9.75

River: ($33.50) 2 (2 players)
SB bets $32.68 (All-In), Hero?

No stats or reads on opponent, except that he was 1-tabling.

Wow, this spot is gross. Intuitively I want to fold, but then again the villain has so few value hands here. But then again, does your average villain on these limits really run a bluff here? Lets check hand combos:

Pocket 3's is the only obvious value hand here imo. 3 combos. Lets say he doesn't 3b JJ here, as you're deep it makes total sense, not sure if NL25 players don't have an auto 3b whenever they see a premium though? Lets also add 1 combo of KK for this reason. There is two posible KJs hands he could hold - K♣:J♣: and K♥:J♥:. Flop and turn could def be KJs, but the river is debatable as many NL25 will probably get afraid of the paired board and the possible AA. Lets give him 1 combo of KJs. As we're not sure if he is a fish or not he might also have hands like J3o, so lets give him a few combos of random junk. Playing one table might indicate him being a fish, so lets keep it simple and give him 4 combos of KJo to cover up for trash hands. 1 combo of slowplayed AA as well.

3 combos 33, 1 combo JJ (we block rest), 1 combo KK, 1 combos KJs, 4combos KJo, 1 combo AA. That's 11 value combos.

If he's running a semi-bluff that missed his most likely holdings are: T9s, QTs, AQs, AQo, Axd, 67-89dd. I do think most villains who opt for the check raise with hands like 67dd, T9ss and AQo will shut down on turn a lot. So lets round up some combos that would 'make sense' for villain to run the bluff with. QTs=3combos, Axd=9 combos. I very much doubt he'll play all these this way so lets cut them in half. ~5 combos.

So 11 value combos vs 5 bluff combos. Pot is 66,2. We need to call 33,7. Approx 2:1. 11/5=2,2. We lose! But throwing in just one more bluff combo and we're on 1.8 aka call is profitable. Remove one value combo and we're break even.

All in all I think you need to have a feel for how pots like these are played on the stake you're on. What's the current 'standard'/paradigm? As it's probably somewhat close I'd opt for a fold cause I'm conservative in these spots myself (why take the unnecessary swings when it's a level you can crush in a ton of other areas?)
Then again - the only hand that makes perfect sense for villain is 33, for previously mentioned reasons. So weighing that against the question - "does villains on NL25 really bluff here, in all honesty?" might make the decission easy as well?
Not sure at all, tough spot. But I'd lean towards fold.


Reply
Quote
YohanN7
Joined: 15.06.2009

I find this hand very easy. Sure, flop and turn play can be discussed, but the issue is (I think OP meant that) the river as played.

River: This is NL25 and villain may actually be bluffing properly. This doesn't matter since our bluff catcher is not even middle division. Only reads can change that, not games of the sort "guess villain's hand".


Reply
Quote
Tinsley15
Joined: 18.07.2013

Playing against two, having initiative, it'd be shame to lose it imo.

maybe we are overplaying/overestimating our fd here. What do we do on a blank, what do we do on a non diamond/ oc vs two guys?


Reply
Quote
Dadramel
Joined: 10.08.2014

Originally posted by Tinsley15
maybe we are overplaying/overestimating our fd here. What do we do on a blank, what do we do on a non diamond/ oc vs two guys?

Thinking that way you would ended up playing overly passive, being afraid of missed draws all the time. Poker is still game of odds that you should get advantage of. Of course cheking the flop might be reasonable, just pointing out the cliches.


Reply
Quote
SWScuracao
Joined: 24.08.2010

Originally posted by YohanN7
I find this hand very easy. Sure, flop and turn play can be discussed, but the issue is (I think OP meant that) the river as played.

River: This is NL25 and villain may actually be bluffing properly. This doesn't matter since our bluff catcher is not even middle division. Only reads can change that, not games of the sort "guess villain's hand".

This.


Reply
Quote
nitrol
Joined: 24.07.2010

Originally posted by Dadramel

Originally posted by Tinsley15
maybe we are overplaying/overestimating our fd here. What do we do on a blank, what do we do on a non diamond/ oc vs two guys?

Thinking that way you would ended up playing overly passive, being afraid of missed draws all the time. Poker is still game of odds that you should get advantage of. Of course cheking the flop might be reasonable, just pointing out the cliches.

Still cannot call the river here.


Reply
Quote
Dadramel
Joined: 10.08.2014

Originally posted by nitrol
Still cannot call the river here.

Agreed, I was referring to the idea of checking the flop.


Reply
Quote