I think you'd have gotten more value from the hand if you raised PF. If they called to showdown with worse hands, I doubt they'd have folded if faced with additional bet PF. Seeing as they didn't fold to your donkbet.
Edit: Why does this hand look so weird? BB acts before SB on flop and later streets, and SB raised PF before UTG acted? Or does your converter not record checks and folds all PF calls?
Second edit: I counted the bets and looked at the final pot won (10.2$) (shouldn't it be displayed as $10.20), and this doesn't make much sense. With a 5% rake, the total pot should be $10.74, and at 10% rake it should be $11.34 (The pot should actually have been $11.50 with a 8,5% rake to be equal $10.2) :/
Neither if your amounts make sense, as at these limits the total pot (rakeless) would be a number divisble by a Small Bet. (And none of the players went allin with their last few cents) Unless some information is missing, this hand doesn't make sense.
Info looks incomplete to me.