Skip to forum
[OFFICIAL Support T...
 
Notifications
Clear all

[OFFICIAL Support Thread] HoldemResources Calculator

484 Posts
98 Users
10 Reactions
204.7 K Views
plexiq
Joined: 28.12.2006

@efkay: Thanks, the fix should be online by tomorrow.

@Jaunais: KO calculations are supported in the current Beta, PKO support should be ready later this month.


Reply
Quote
tonypmm
Joined: 11.01.2009

Originally posted by plexiq
PKO support should be ready later this month. :f_love: :f_thumbsup: I'm so glad to see that you haven't abandoned the development of new features in HRC!


Reply
Quote
Pocker77
Joined: 22.03.2009

DEL.


Reply
Quote
Jaunais
Joined: 24.01.2014

How to calculate KO situation in beta version when we have KOs but its not in the ITM? How to show KOs $ for each player?


Reply
Quote
plexiq
Joined: 28.12.2006

Sorry for missing that last post before.

Regarding installation of beta/stable: Simply install the program twice in different locations, and only do the Beta upgrade procedure on one of them. You can switch back-and-forth, or even have both versions running at the same time.

http://www.holdemresources.net/hrc/faq/q/activatebeta


Reply
Quote
Jaunais
Joined: 24.01.2014

How to calculate KO situation in beta version when we have KOs but its not in the ITM? How to show KOs $ for each player?


Reply
Quote
plexiq
Joined: 28.12.2006

You can use the MTT model for KO calculations before the final table. We currently only support regular KOs with equal bounties on all players, progressive KOs may be supported in the future though.


Reply
Quote
fastroller
Joined: 05.01.2010

Apologize if I missed it in the thread. I've seen one guy ask hypothetically if he could adjust to edge pass 0.2 but I'm wondering do you guys have a good system for edge passing?
I'll give my estimates:
>15bbs pass on .4
12-15bb pass on 0.3
10-12bb pass on 0.2
<10bb pass on 0.1 if any?

I'm just pulling these out of my you know what and don't know if it's a good strategy or whatever I have no real idea.


Reply
Quote
plexiq
Joined: 28.12.2006

My general advice is to not pass on any edges by default, unless you have specific reasons to do so.


Reply
Quote
Spinosa
Joined: 01.04.2007
plexiq
Joined: 28.12.2006

Hi, please try to re-install from scratch (uninstall HRC, manually delete any remaining files, then re-install). This looks like your installation may be corrupted. If the problem persists then please send the exact hand setup so we can try to reproduce the issue.


Reply
Quote
Gerovit
Joined: 16.01.2011

HRC doesn't take into account card removal effect as i understood?
Doesn't that mean that if folded to btn f.e and he shoves it\s more likely that he has stronger hand?
And can it be somewhat fixed if we put certain edge?


Reply
Quote
plexiq
Joined: 28.12.2006

Correct, HRC doesn't take card removal from folded ranges into account. This means that when it's folded to late positions then player holdings will typically be slightly stronger on average, compared to the HRC calculation.

I guess you could try to compensate for this by using an edge. The effect varies depending on the hand though, so specifying an edge for your entire range can only be a rough approximation at best. The adjustment edge would need to be determined on a per-spot basis, i don't have any recommendations how to go about this though.


Reply
Quote
twisterk
Joined: 22.08.2012

Hi

Why in this CashEV simulation EP shoves wider than CO/BTN?


Reply
Quote
plexiq
Joined: 28.12.2006

The action is limited to at most 3 active players. Once 3 players enter the pot, all remaining players are automatically folded.

For very short stacks this restriction becomes very significant, the early position ranges actually become wider as there is an increased chance that SB/BB will be forced out of the pot due to the player limit and this results in additional dead money.

We'll add a Monte Carlo mode with 4+ way all-ins later this year, check the beta announcement for other planned features:
http://www.holdemresources.net/blog/2018-hrc-public-beta/


Reply
Quote
twisterk
Joined: 22.08.2012

Does that mean that the UTG shoving ranges for 6-7bbs could also be loser than they should be?


Reply
Quote
plexiq
Joined: 28.12.2006

Well, it becomes a significant factor once the overcall ranges are fairly wide. At 6-7bb the overcalls against UTG are still below 5%, so the possibility of a 4th player entering the pot with an even tighter range probably doesn't influence the initial UTG range much.


Reply
Quote
RotesProblem
Joined: 12.09.2016

Hey there, got a Question for advanced ppl who know the Programm.
Posted in wrong Topic; heres the link.

https://forums.pokerstrategy.com/forum/thread.php?threadid=454125

Please help!!! :f_grin:


Reply
Quote
plexiq
Joined: 28.12.2006

Originally posted by RotesProblem
Hey Guys,

Got a Question for Holdem Resources!!! My Bad wrong Place i guess :f_zZz:

im working on Sunday Hands Right now and have Trouble with this one...

Spoiler

MP+2: 19.97 BB (VPIP: 25.00, PFR: 16.67, 3Bet Preflop: 12.50, Hands: 20)
CO: 84.43 BB (VPIP: 26.32, PFR: 22.22, 3Bet Preflop: 0.00, Hands: 19)
BTN: 121.26 BB (VPIP: 29.24, PFR: 19.30, 3Bet Preflop: 6.76, Hands: 171)
SB: 35.23 BB (VPIP: 30.77, PFR: 22.22, 3Bet Preflop: 3.85, Hands: 65)
BB: 22.1 BB (VPIP: 0.00, PFR: 0.00, 3Bet Preflop: -, Hands: 2)
UTG: 69.62 BB (VPIP: 0.00, PFR: 0.00, 3Bet Preflop: 0.00, Hands: 5)
UTG+1: 60.59 BB (VPIP: 0.00, PFR: 0.00, 3Bet Preflop: -, Hands: 3)
MP: 77.48 BB (VPIP: 31.25, PFR: 25.00, 3Bet Preflop: 25.00, Hands: 16)
Hero (MP+1): 16.86 BB

9 players post ante of 0.16 BB, SB posts SB 0.5 BB, BB posts BB 1 BB

Pre Flop: (pot: 2.9 BB) Hero has A♣ J♠

UTG raises to 2 BB, UTG+1 calls 2 BB, fold, Hero raises to 16.71 BB and is all-in, fold, CO calls 16.71 BB, fold, fold, fold, UTG raises to 69.47 BB and is all-in, fold, CO calls 52.76 BB

Flop: (160.54 BB, 3 players) 3♣ K♣ Q♣

Turn: (160.54 BB, 3 players) J♥

River: (160.54 BB, 3 players) J♦

UTG shows K♦ A♥ (Two Pair, Kings and Jacks)

Main Pot [55.02 BB]: (Pre 55%, Flop 46%, Turn 67%)
Side Pot#1 [105.52 BB]: (Pre 73%, Flop 89%, Turn 90%)

CO shows Q♠ A♦ (Two Pair, Queens and Jacks)

Main Pot [55.02 BB]: (Pre 24%, Flop 6%, Turn 7%)
Side Pot#1 [105.52 BB]: (Pre 27%, Flop 11%, Turn 10%)

Hero shows A♣ J♠ (Three of a Kind, Jacks)

Main Pot [55.02 BB]: (Pre 21%, Flop 48%, Turn 26%)

UTG wins 105.52 BB
Hero wins 55.02 BB

Unfortuneatly however im missing something in Holdem Resources Manager..

I went like this:

Paste History > Advanced Hand > Chip EV in BB > (NEXT) Open: 1800 > Allow Limping > Finish

But all Players under Initail Raiser can only 3B !??!?

Help what am i missing?

In the hand you got an open raise, then flat call, 3-bet and another flat call. So to set this up you would need to enable single flats for the open and the 3-bet, you do not need limping enabled. Do do this, you'd select the left checkboxes in the "Open" and "3-Bet" lines.

However, HRC can only analyze hands with at most 3 active players at this time, so you'd have to modify the action a bit to be able to analyze it. Maybe skipping the UTG+1 flat is your best option here.


Reply
Quote
zulusierra
Joined: 17.11.2008

I found that fgs will give different results than chip ev in a winner takes all game.
I'm trying to find out some push/call ranges in Spin&Go 3 handed.
Should I use fgs or stick to chip ev?


Reply
Quote