Skip to forum
Notifications
Clear all

16$ FR NLHE - QTo BTN vs BB vs a turn shove

8 Posts
5 Users
0 Reactions
466 Views
stevegold87
Joined: 18.06.2009

Do you ever call that shove?
Or you think BB is checking a king on the flop?
I dont beat much...but because ofBTN vs BB dynamic I am tempted to call here.

PokerStars - 400/800 Ante 100 NL - Holdem - 8 players
Hand converted by PokerTracker 4

SB: 60.79 BB
BB: 13.3 BB
UTG: 64.04 BB
UTG+1: 44.33 BB
MP: 31.09 BB
MP+1: 8.82 BB
CO: 21.36 BB
Hero (BTN): 36.22 BB

8 players post ante of 0.13 BB, SB posts SB 0.5 BB, BB posts BB 1 BB

Pre Flop: (pot: 2.5 BB) Hero has Q♦ T♥

fold, fold, fold, fold, fold, Hero raises to 2 BB, fold, BB calls 1 BB

Flop: (5.5 BB, 2 players) 4♣ K♦ 6♠
BB checks, Hero checks

Turn: (5.5 BB, 2 players) T♣
BB bets 11.18 BB and is all-in, fold

BB wins 5.5 BB


Reply
Quote
7 replies
Super Moderator
VorpalF2F
Joined: 02.09.2010

Speaking of passive...

That seems to be a natural flop to CBet, and since you didn't he could very well hold a K and simply have checked to the raiser.
A half-pot CBet won't hurt your stack much if he x/r you for example -- and if he doesn't have a king the pot is yours right then.

OTOH, if he has no king, I'm thinking he's thinking: Well clearly CO has no K, so I might as well try to steal the pot.


Reply
Quote
stevegold87
Joined: 18.06.2009

Yes you are right, I usually cbet like 90% of my hands which is probably why I checked in this situation but looking at it a cbet would save me headaches. I tend to notice that people float as well way more these days when you cbet. I will need to look at his stats


Reply
Quote
yadijavadi
Joined: 31.01.2018

Well done Vorpal! You nearly made perfect sense there.

When you check the flop you can take TP+ from your perceived range. When the villain ob jams against an opponent who doesn’t have anything strong in his range, it’s obviously a bluff.


Reply
Quote
stevegold87
Joined: 18.06.2009

Only problem is I steal a lot I do find if I cbet all of my steals I dont hit it will be expensive in the long run


Reply
Quote
yadijavadi
Joined: 31.01.2018

Expensive for the villains, that Cbet will make you money. This board is very dry so your Cbet bluff will make more than it usually would.

Before stealing it is good to check how often they fold to cbets rather than making that blanket statement. Many people fold loads making it an easy Cbet, others very rarely.

In this example the check back on the flop is fine. I prefer this play to the Cbet. If he checks the turn you can take down the pot. You have pretty good showdown value too. And you could always improve and then he could make a silly ob jam bluff.


Reply
Quote
mardibg
Joined: 01.03.2018

Originally posted by VorpalF2F
Speaking of passive...

That seems to be a natural flop to CBet, and since you didn't he could very well hold a K and simply have checked to the raiser.
A half-pot CBet won't hurt your stack much if he x/r you for example -- and if he doesn't have a king the pot is yours right then.

OTOH, if he has no king, I'm thinking he's thinking: Well clearly CO has no K, so I might as well try to steal the pot.

I agree


Reply
Quote
Moderator
SDK1987
Joined: 12.11.2008

Cbet would be standard indeed. As played his shove makes no sense at all on the turn. I expect he would bbet around half pot if he has a strong hand. Off course defending out of position with a 13bb stack isn't a great move ether for a good player with big antes in play. I would push or fold with a 13bb stack in the BB.

That makes it really tough to know if he's shoving this for value or as bluff. I expect a passive villain will never bluff and than it's a easy fold, but if he's a thinking player I would most likely call.

Cheers,
SDK1987


Reply
Quote