Skip to forum
Notifications
Clear all

5$ | spin | turn | AJo

7 Posts
5 Users
0 Reactions
327 Views
Coach
maniac
Joined: 29.03.2006

hi,

looks like I missed a 2nd barrel here.

iPoker - 15/30 NL (3 max) - Holdem - 2 players
Hand converted by Holdem Manager 3

Hero (BB): 835 (27.8 bb)
SB: 665 (22.2 bb)

2 players post ante of 5, SB posts 15, Hero posts BB 30

Pre Flop: (pot: 55) Hero has J♥: A♣:
SB calls 15, Hero raises to 90, SB calls 60

Flop: (190, 2 players) 5♠: 4♥: Q♦:
Hero bets 90, SB calls 90

Turn: (370, 2 players) 3♦:
Hero checks, SB bets 180, Hero folds

Spoiler

Results: 370 pot (0 rake)
Final Board: 5♠: 4♥: Q♦: 3♦:

SB wins 370


Reply
Quote
6 replies
Moderator
SDK1987
Joined: 12.11.2008

It depends on villain if I would 2nd barrel or not, but check/folding isn't to bad against a unknown.

Cheers,
SDK1987


Reply
Quote
Kriegphilosopher
Joined: 02.03.2012

line is fine, only the sizing is too big both preflop and on the flop hey


Reply
Quote
Moderator
Axif1
Joined: 19.11.2011

JAM it pre, this hand does not have a very good playability

and it always makes me wonder, whether we can really play it better postflop compared to shoving, as we are OOP with AJo... idk, but since there are antes in game, shoving seems even better to me

maybe I am just scared to play big pots OOP vs randoms haha

sizing seems to be good, if it is totally readless I would barrel ott again

@Krieg: you have to realize, that you give him a lot of room for improvement by betting small, then he can make a play even with nothing, as smaller sizing might induce him, and if we do the math, I dont mind betting bigger once, than betting twice smaller...

fold equity is the king nowadays... not just nowadays - but all of DEM DAYZ hahaha


Reply
Quote
savage1981
Joined: 31.05.2010

I tend to agree with Axif. Raising non-all in preflop would require us to play perfectly post flop, hence I would prefer a shove. Suggesting that 3x raise pre out of position is too large is strange.


Reply
Quote
Kriegphilosopher
Joined: 02.03.2012

Shoving pre is +EV

Raising 3bb vs limp oop is +EV

Raising 2,3-2,7bb vs limp oop is +++EV..., if we realize all of our range 22bb deep (How are you gonna play JTo? preflop reasons - Raise 3x/call? Raise 3x/fold? check behind? all horendous options readless; now postflop reasons - you have lesser SPR, better playability, potential to either 2 barrel ´n shove or size big otf and then shove...)

Originally posted by Axif1
@Krieg: you have to realize, that you give him a lot of room for improvement by betting small, then he can make a play even with nothing, as smaller sizing might induce him...

No worries, I mind none of this. For this I have an Ace in a sleeve which is called adjustment abiliity :)

Originally posted by savage1981
I tend to agree with Axif. ...
Suggesting that 3x raise pre out of position is too large is strange.

ok, what does Axif actually say? Imho it should not be strange when we deduce implications of his opinion on oop plays and SPR

Originally posted by Axif1
maybe I am just scared to play big pots OOP vs randoms haha

I tend to agree with Axif as well when it comes to playing OOP with too high SPR. It makes me think of a solution. Perhaps we might raise not as much as 3x! Do we need high Fold equity? Naah man. Do we need any FEq at all being limped to? NO! Check your T2o, take a look at flop for free and raise 2,6x depolarized range, where you like to be both called or folded to! Moreover your eventual T2o limper bluffraise has lower EV than 1st hand readless check and c/r otf with ATC trash in HU ;) So, once you think in ranges and not in a hand vakuum, you (almost) never want to bluffraise limper. Be depolarized and don´t (need to) be scared to play oop:f_thumbsup:


Reply
Quote
Moderator
Axif1
Joined: 19.11.2011

actually, I am trying to ISO uber wide and see how it works

always trying to keep my mind open

there is never just ONE correct answer...


Reply
Quote