Skip to forum
Notifications
Clear all

SB with AKs vs BUT

6 Posts
4 Users
1 Reactions
315 Views
Deine
Joined: 27.07.2019

Hello,

it was the very first hand here, i hadnt info about villain. I only noticed he had half stack. Thoughts abouf this all in ?

Hero (SB): $49.50 (99 bb)
BB: $51 (102 bb)
BTN: $29.12 (58.2 bb)

Preflop: Hero is SB with A♣: K♣:
BTN raises to $1.50, Hero raises to $5, BB folds, BTN raises to $15.50, Hero raises to $49.50 and is all-in, BTN calls $13.62

Flop: ($58.74) K♥: 4♣: 3♣: (2 players, 1 is all-in)
Turn: ($58.74) 8♣: (2 players, 1 is all-in)
River: ($58.74) 2♠: (2 players, 1 is all-in)

Results:

Spoiler

$58.74 pot ($0.75 rake)
Final Board: K♥: 4♣: 3♣: 8♣: 2♠:
Hero showed A♣: K♣: and won $57.99 ($28.87 net)
BTN showed Q♣: Q♥: and lost (-$29.12 net)


Reply
Quote
5 replies
ghaleon
Joined: 17.10.2007

Super standard? 60bb deep SBvsBU we should be really happy to stack off AKs. If we get to some 150bb+ I might start to just call versus 4bet. 100bb deep it should be really standard in late position action.

Well villain preflop 4bet sizing make no sense though.


Reply
Quote
Deine
Joined: 27.07.2019

Thank you !

why it make no sense villains 4bet?
If he could have AA or KK how should he play ?


Reply
Quote
kerity
Joined: 08.04.2008

because he commit himself even with all his bluff. With 60 BB you cannot 4bet/fold.


Reply
Quote
pisiattu
Joined: 01.04.2010

I change table, 3way and with a midstsck isn't a good table.

As played vs oppo with this deepish you can 3bet 4-4.5, after 4bet or shove I play my stack


Reply
Quote
kerity
Joined: 08.04.2008

I change table, 3way and with a midstsck isn't a good table.

Why ? midstack are recreationnal player, i prefer a table with 1 reg and 1 recreational than 4 reg for 1 recreational player


Reply
Quote