Skip to forum
Notifications
Clear all

Exploitative and leak busting training software based off free content, e.g. hand histories & stats

7 Posts
3 Users
1 Reactions
704 Views
SamSay
Joined: 03.01.2016

Is anyone interested in utilizing their own free content like hand history and stats for exploitative strategy and leak busting training software?

Idea in details:

Personally I am interested in all of the next 3 use cases:
1. Leak busting: Interactive re-player software where I import my own hands that I played incorrectly (using PokerSnowie blunders for instance). I should have to press buttons just like in a real game, and be able to provide a correct decision for a hand that I played incorrectly.
2. Learn by copying strategy from the best regs based on my observed hand history. This is similar as in # 1, but it should be based off my observed hand history.
3. Learn the maximum exploitative strategy based strictly on a mass database analysis of a combination of line, board and player type. We will need an interactive re-player here also, but it should be driven by stats collected for board texture, player type and line combination.

My impression so far is that training software for any these use cases is not available on the market yet.
I would like to know if my impression is correct, or there is anything available already.
If nothing is available, I would like to understand why that is the case, and find partners to build it (I am a software developer).
I also would like to understand if anyone else is interested in training software for any of those 3 use cases, or it is just me.


Reply
Quote
6 replies
Super Moderator
VorpalF2F
Joined: 02.09.2010

Hi SamSay,
I can't think of anything like this -- it sounds like a terrific idea though...

Cheers,
VS


Reply
Quote
SamSay
Joined: 03.01.2016

Would you be more interested in # 1, 2 or 3 to start with?

-So far I have implemented # 3 well enough to be very happy for my own internal use, and I am finishing training flops in single raised pots using it already.
The solution is skewed a little bit to PartyPoker on flop as of now, because that is where I play, but it is possible to choose between Party Poker and all sites.
It is practical, but with minimalistic UI yet - no re-player, just board, line, villain type, initiative, positions and drop downs to select percentages for call or bet/raise actions, but the hand history database size behind it is quite serious, and you can get an idea where it can go.
If anyone is interested, let me know - I can share a link, where you can see more details and practice low dry board texture vs 4 player types on any street as long as you want and always for free.

If it is a fact that we still do not have commercial solutions for ## 1-3, then it strikes me as if poker were still treated more like a hobby, than a profession.


Reply
Quote
Super Moderator
VorpalF2F
Joined: 02.09.2010

Originally posted by SamSay
Would you be more interested in # 1, 2 or 3 to start with?

My NLHE volume is no where near high enough to make such a tool meaningful.

But given a choice, #1 would be more useful.

Originally posted by SamSay
-So far I have implemented # 3 well enough to be very happy for my own internal use, and I am finishing training flops in single raised pots using it already.
The solution is skewed a little bit to PartyPoker on flop as of now, because that is where I play...

I'm a bit confused (normal for me :coolface: ) but how would it work at all w/ PartyPoker since it doesn't save hand histories any more...


Reply
Quote
SamSay
Joined: 03.01.2016

But given a choice, #1 would be more useful.

-Thank you for the feedback

I'm a bit confused (normal for me :coolface: ) but how would it work at all w/ PartyPoker since it doesn't save hand histories any more...

-I believe that hand tracking tools like H2N are still working for me in NJ. Do you have PT4 or HM? Are you playing in NJ? And I would be able to use my old history regardless.


Reply
Quote
vikash62004
Joined: 11.05.2010

sounds like a terrible to me too.


Reply
Quote
SamSay
Joined: 03.01.2016

Originally posted by vikash62004
sounds like a terrible to me too.

Do you mind to elaborate why it seems terrible to you please?


Reply
Quote