UTG+1: 14/8/2 (63 hands), MP+1: 34/5/2 (103 hands)
Preflop 3-bet: I think the move itself is OK. But was the sizing also OK? 3x bet + 1 call = 4*4 BB = 16 BB? After reviewing the hand it is more likely to have a call from UTG+1 and smaller bet size could makes MP+1 a good spot to call smaller 3bet. (No significant data of F3B.)
Also after reviewing villain could have Ax most likely (something like AA, AK, KK, QQ, but I think we can exclude AQs and JJ), but should I also check the flop in this case? Based on this I think the flop bet was too big.
I think the situation was pretty standard, but I could saved a couple of BB by thinking during the hand.
Lessons learned: bet sizing, using stats in more detailed way online, not just checking, 'OK, it's not a maniac and something like that). It's 'good' to make mistakes like this so I can improve my way of playing a hand (= using stats and all the available information), not just playing based on the strength of my hand and use only a few stats. Even at NL2 several different aspects could came up for a cheap price.
Any other thoughts?
PokerStars - $0.02 NL - Holdem - 8 players
Hand converted by PokerTracker 4
BB: 37.5 BB
UTG: 100 BB
UTG+1: 149.5 BB
MP: 128.5 BB
MP+1: 127 BB
CO: 139.5 BB
Hero (BTN): 100 BB
SB: 86.5 BB
SB posts SB 0.5 BB, BB posts BB 1 BB
Pre Flop: (pot: 1.5 BB) Hero has K♦ K♠
fold, UTG+1 raises to 4 BB, fold, MP+1 calls 4 BB, fold, Hero raises to 16 BB, fold, fold, UTG+1 calls 12 BB, fold
Flop: (37.5 BB, 2 players) 9♥ A♣ 2♦
UTG+1 checks, Hero bets 15 BB, UTG+1 raises to 30 BB, fold