Skip to forum
Notifications
Clear all

[PLO2] AAQ3s 3bet pot OOP

10 Posts
4 Users
1 Reactions
1,359 Views
efkay
Joined: 25.03.2005

villain plays 70/30 pretty much everything

OTF I block topset and NFD. without any backdoors my thought was 'I dont want to see turns' so my conclusion was dont check + pot for max FE. with SPR 4 I need 33% when getting raised but I think I can achieve this. Still asking because I know SPR4 is like the crossing line of mid-low SPR

On the other side I dont cbet this flops often, villain seems to be very spewy and might overplay/bluff many of his hands. If I just had a little bit more I think x/c is the better line?!

PokerStars - $0.02 PL Hi (6 max) - Omaha Hi - 6 players
Hand converted by Holdem Manager 3

MP: $1.62 (81 bb)
CO: $2.00 (100 bb)
BTN: $3.92 (196 bb)
SB: $0.71 (35.5 bb)
Hero (BB): $3.42 (171 bb)
UTG: $4.43 (221.5 bb)

SB posts $0.01, Hero posts BB $0.02

Pre Flop: (pot: $0.03) Hero has Q♣: A♣: A♦: 3♣:
2 folds, CO raises to $0.07, 2 folds, Hero raises to $0.22, CO calls $0.15

Flop: ($0.45, 2 players) 9♦: 5♦: Q♠:
Hero bets $0.44, CO raises to $1.76, Hero raises to $3.08, CO calls $0.02 and is all-in


Reply
Quote
9 replies
ghaleon
Joined: 17.10.2007

I think theory wise this hand would work as pot-fold hand. A♦: and Q are both strong blockers to create fe. This flop is one where half pot doesnt get lot of folds so this hand doesnt really benefit from that. Issue though is that versus vpip 70 even pot size might not create much fe and I dont really want to pot and stack off personally. I would imagine its roughly breakeven at best. So in the end versus this type of player x-f is likely best.


Reply
Quote
efkay
Joined: 25.03.2005

x/fold when blocking so many made hands?


Reply
Quote
ghaleon
Joined: 17.10.2007

Well there are not that many turns we are happy to barrel on turn and if we don't get much folds with pot and stack off is marginal it just doesn't bring that many good spots. Like what is our plan if turn is diamond, 6, 7, 8, T, J or K?

Problem with this sort of player is that he won't fold likely any fd. So A♦: blocks one flush out but it doesn't really matter more than that most likely.


Reply
Quote
ZakYoun270
Joined: 10.12.2015

I like half potting the flop and folding to a raise. Check call is not a good option with this hand imo.


Reply
Quote
BradNitt
Joined: 22.07.2011

as what i check out for similar scenario (bb vs BTN to adjust a bit the wide range) its actually half pot and fold vs potraise with the A♦:
think half pot because we still have theoretically kinda good future playability with the diamond but its served better with medium spr on future streets to leave more room i would think.


Reply
Quote
efkay
Joined: 25.03.2005

potcbet or potcheckraise? :) I consider checkraise as another option since ghaleon mentioned all the tricky turns


Reply
Quote
ghaleon
Joined: 17.10.2007

Yeah I suppose solver prefer small bet to be able to use nut flush blocker to bluff but versus this sort of player. Well we can try to fold out less than flush maybe.

I dont like x-r because again I dont think hand is strong enough to stack off at least in "happy way" :)

Exception could be with read that villain stab very wide versus check so we either create ton of fe or villain stack off like gutshot type stuff.


Reply
Quote
BradNitt
Joined: 22.07.2011

i checked again with couple more filters AAQ without set , no 9,5, no FD/BDFD, no straight draw blocker and A♦:, we bet half pot 98% in solver, check2%. our combo 99,8% and looks like the most reasonable action that we don't want "overcommit" us and the other player, or invest too much and check fold on straightening cards for example.

the small percentage if it checks then just to check call. against half pot bet (ev around 5,4 vs ev check raise pot size 4,6), against potsize bet also 100% check/call (ev 2 vs c/r ev-2)


Reply
Quote
efkay
Joined: 25.03.2005

tyvm, I think 1/2 cbet-fold makes sense meanwhile too :)


Reply
Quote