Skip to forum
Ask Dara O'Kearney ...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Ask Dara O'Kearney (and Barry) a strategy question [CONTEST OVER]

36 Posts
26 Users
6 Reactions
3,143 Views
Super Moderator
VorpalF2F
Joined: 02.09.2010

Originally posted by JWLMRS
Who would win: the best GTO player or the worst GTO player;>? And why the best GTO player...but after a long battle;>?

My guess is that both would lose to rake in the long term, since the object of optimizing ranges using game theory is to avoid being exploited.
I once watched two very good 5-Card Draw players playing heads-up FL $1/$2 5-Card Draw. After an hour is see-sawing back and forth they were both down about 10 bucks total. Once hold'em ranges are known to the same degree 5-Card Draw ranges are, then the game would be unwinnable.


Reply
Quote
Hausierer
Joined: 10.05.2005

What was first, chicken or egg? ( with a a substantiation pls )

This question is torturing me since ages so I hope you guys can help me out=)


Reply
Quote
Super Moderator
VorpalF2F
Joined: 02.09.2010

Originally posted by Hausierer
What was first, chicken or egg? ( with a a substantiation pls )

This question is torturing me since ages so I hope you guys can help me out=)

To test this I ordered one of each on Amazon.
When I returned home, both packages were on the doorstep, so I still don't know


Reply
Quote
Danjo99
Joined: 26.06.2009

Do you have plans for writing even more books together in the future?

And when yes, which topics we can expect?


Reply
Quote
jonnyyman12
Joined: 10.01.2011

Are there really valid tools/approaches on how to find leaks in your own game without external help?


Reply
Quote
led29
Joined: 31.01.2012

The article ‘Myths about GTO’ tells that many lessons from the world of GTO that are useful even if you are playing in soft games: the best hands to bluff with, the best hands to bluffcatch with, the right bet size for dry and wet flops, how to play against different range types, when to overbet and how to use blockers. Based on this, there is a question: does the book include the specific examples (with concrete spots or types of opponents) of adaption exploit strategy with GTO? Or will this theme plan to show apart?


Reply
Quote
badmoe92
Joined: 25.02.2014

Hey Barry, what's the deal with your stupid news artikels? That's not normal, is it?


Reply
Quote
Shqual
Joined: 04.05.2010

Approximately how much total time work went into your book?

Which poker book would you recommend (in addition to that of course) in this day and age? :)


Reply
Quote
Head Admin
SvenBe
Joined: 19.04.2006

What do you think would be the most +EV way for me to take part in this or any other raffle without looking like I cheated


Reply
Quote
Elisamo
Joined: 12.08.2008

Jo Barry, do you think the story of our austrian legend mario z aka captain would have ended differently if your book had been published in 2019?


Reply
Quote
Head Admin
BarryCarter
Joined: 13.01.2011

Ok folks locking thread - we will be doing the answers and picking winners later today


Reply
Quote
Head Admin
BarryCarter
Joined: 13.01.2011

The winners are:

dreiFingerjoe
nmilan84
VorpalF2F
jonnyyman12
mantelo

I will follow you, follow me back and I will DM the prize

Video to follow with the AMA answers and also the prize draw live footage


Reply
Quote
Mareckiy
Joined: 04.08.2012

It's not December 8 yet tho! :(
Anyway I'm gonna ask this as I'd just like to know Dara's thoughts:

Do you have any rules of thumb/heuristics for analyzing big field MTT spots where we are getting somewhat close to the bubble but won't get there yet for a significant amount of time i.e 500 paid, 850 left or 300 paid, 600 left? Do you find multi table HRC results accurate for such scenarios? I'd like to gain more awareness than simple X% field left to the money => add Y% risk premium. How much EV we gain by doubling up vs risking going busto etc.


Reply
Quote
Head Admin
BarryCarter
Joined: 13.01.2011

Originally posted by Mareckiy
It's not December 8 yet tho! :(
Anyway I'm gonna ask this as I'd just like to know Dara's thoughts:

Do you have any rules of thumb/heuristics for analyzing big field MTT spots where we are getting somewhat close to the bubble but won't get there yet for a significant amount of time i.e 500 paid, 850 left or 300 paid, 600 left? Do you find multi table HRC results accurate for such scenarios? I'd like to gain more awareness than simple X% field left to the money => add Y% risk premium. How much EV we gain by doubling up vs risking going busto etc.

We cover this a lot in Endgame Poker Strategy, but I think Dara has already done a rough heuristic for big field MTTs, this is what he told Kevin Martin:

This actually stemmed from a question asked by my good pal and favourite poker Twitcher Kevin Martin.

"Dara! Question that you could maybe help me with. Let’s say I was playing 6 online tables. What would be all the info required to get a relatively accurate assessment of the $ value of all my stacks?
I was trying to figure this out but I’m sure you know off the top of your head"

My response:
Assuming there are too many tables to do exact ICM calculation the quickest way to get a ballpark would be to sum the value of all your chip count values. For example, 2x starting in a 109 is worth 2x100=200. Half a starting stack would be 50 etc. Do this for your 6 tables and you’re in the ballpark

This method will be very accurate early on in tourneys but late on near bubble and beyond ICM distorts things. Short stacks will be worth a lot more than their chip value so you might need to add 20-50%. Conversely your very big stacks will be worth the same amount less.

This is a useful skill around bubbles. Work out what your stack will be worth after bubble, what it would be worth if you doubled, and that’ll give you a sense how tight you need to get it in.

When money is already paid out after bubble you have to account for this too. Your stack is now worth roughly the % of chips you have multiplied by remaining prize pool to be played for. For example if there are 20 left, the remaining prizes add to 100k and you have 5% of the chips and everyone is guaranteed 1k, then your stack is worth 5% of 80k (after taking out the 20 everyone is guaranteed) plus the 1k you’re guaranteed. So 5k total.

On a final table these methods will get you close but to be exact it’s an ICM calculation.


Reply
Quote
Head Admin
BarryCarter
Joined: 13.01.2011

Our answers are here


Reply
Quote