Skip to forum
Micros are not nitt...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Micros are not nitty, i will prove you wrong

107 Posts
9 Users
6 Reactions
4,671 Views
ghaleon
Joined: 17.10.2007

This debate is sort of funky one. Doesn't make too much point to post single hands as there are very tight and maniacs on all pools. If there is really desire to compare different limits that would require big sample and some pool database analyzing.

But what tend to happen when moving up limits is more and more people have better theoretical understanding of the game. Which for most part also fuels more aggression. Though the aggression does also change its form. One common spot example could be average oop cbet frequencies which probably come down quite a bit.


Reply
Quote
pokerboy198229
Joined: 20.08.2011

Imagine i dont have a full house, what I have to fold overpairs then because it is a microstakes??


Reply
Quote
aleasy77
Joined: 03.03.2014

pokerboy198229 in this spot which You post tonight I call with AA/KK (You write about overpair do on the river this hands are overpairs). Opponent still third bet with busted flush draw, sometimes I see this moves too with hands like 99-TT but more often he probably donkbet postflop with draw. Yes he can too 6x with value hands.


Reply
Quote
Moderator
SDK1987
Joined: 12.11.2008

Originally posted by pokerboy198229
Tight range, 5bet shoving pre vs cold 4bet:
https://gg.gl/nbh80

This was over play with the 22. You only 4bet with better pairs and AK.


Reply
Quote
Moderator
SDK1987
Joined: 12.11.2008

Originally posted by pokerboy198229
Imagine i dont have a full house, what I have to fold overpairs then because it is a microstakes??

If I had a over pair I would call villain down. No point in raising and give villain rope to bluff and is tough to get value with raising.


Reply
Quote
aleasy77
Joined: 03.03.2014

This time no hands review but maybe somebody help about my statistic. I build database on Hand2Note and read 20k hands from cash game (from August this year). Win rate ev bb/100 shows only 3bb (I play bad and I am the worst poker player). And some statistic about strange hands.


I put tomorrow stats about VPIP, RPF, 3BET, CBET, ETC.
But when I check on statname some information are different than in hand2note.


Reply
Quote
pokerboy198229
Joined: 20.08.2011

So if I understand well your stats are 29/26/21. I do like they have less gap inbetween the stats. I asking myself is it profitable to have 3bet so high as 21%?? Maybe this limits you win bb on 100 hands....When I was playing 5nl I had 7bb per 100 wtih 19/16/7 as stats.

Your WTSD and WSD shows you play a lot fit/fold strategy. So if you have it you bet it, otherwise you fold. Thast very tight, it def limits you win bb as well.
Remmeber those hands as AK/KJ, i believe if you will bet these hand on lower but not connected boards the stats will be better.

Hand strenght shows a lot of trush?? Is it the way it is or I understand it wrong? Otherwise you could change your 3bets range to gto 3bet range.

And last thing, is it 20K or 2.1K hands?
Otherwise I would play 20K hands to have a better insight of your own game...


Reply
Quote
aleasy77
Joined: 03.03.2014

So I write about difference on stats about hand2note and statname. This stats is from value hands (not for all) this 29/26/21. On statname from 1st August to Yesterday I have nearly 19/15/7.
Hand2Note upload to database 20k hands but here shows 2.4k I don't know why.


Reply
Quote
nsavov
Joined: 24.09.2010

Because you put a filter of some random hands like 42o, 95s, 33, KK+ and some but not all broadways. That's why you get 2.1k hands.

After that you put another filter for Flop Set that gives you 9 hands. Since you chose only 33, KK, AA, it shows only the 9 sets from these hands.

Do you mind removing all the filters?


Reply
Quote
aleasy77
Joined: 03.03.2014

I try see how many times I catch set postflop but something bad chosen here later I put more statistic from 20k hands.


Reply
Quote
aleasy77
Joined: 03.03.2014

I put this from hand2note

I check statistic about sets, catch 8% times with all pocket pairs.


Reply
Quote
CheesyEagl3
Joined: 21.07.2021

You're playing too tight brother. These stats basically make you a nit, haha.

W34z3l's (former popular coach here) preflop ranges would put you at 24/18 with 8% 3bet. At the lowest limits I can imagine these numbers to be even higher, as people in general play tighter and defend their blinds less, which you exploit by opening wider, especially from late positions.

Btw by following GTO ranges you would end up with slightly looser stats, let's say 27/21 or so.


Reply
Quote
aleasy77
Joined: 03.03.2014

On statname some statistic are different but I go high with VPIP/PRF/3Bet but that's not work for now (on this month VPIP 18% PRF 14% 3bet 7.1% and on minus bb/100).


Reply
Quote
pokerboy198229
Joined: 20.08.2011

Look, do we call here a lot on micro stakes? No or Yes. I did call him because he had agressive stats, not because of the micro level


Reply
Quote
aleasy77
Joined: 03.03.2014

I call too on the turn and the river of course he can has here Ah but he can has too worse heart or try bluff here.

I write often about nitty/passive preflop action like last time open limp with AA, just call 3bet with kings or open limp-call min raise with jacks preflop.


Reply
Quote
Moderator
SDK1987
Joined: 12.11.2008

That's fair enough. I made you're picture visible for you.

Originally posted by aleasy77
I put this from hand2note

I check statistic about sets, catch 8% times with all pocket pairs.

Seems reasobale stats for full ring games, but for 6 handed it's indeed tight.


Reply
Quote
aleasy77
Joined: 03.03.2014

Like how I write before I get to higher this stats and lose more than before and why? Too hard connected with boards? More or less cbets? Today I lose big pot because fish calls big bet on turn KQJT with KT I get AK, river typical sucks T...


Reply
Quote
CheesyEagl3
Joined: 21.07.2021

Originally posted by aleasy77
Like how I write before I get to higher this stats and lose more than before and why? Too hard connected with boards? More or less cbets? Today I lose big pot because fish calls big bet on turn KQJT with KT I get AK, river typical sucks T...

He called the turn having 10% chance to win. Unfortunately he managed to hit the full house this time. You were unlucky. The thing is that the other 90% of the time you're making money from his bad call on the turn. In long term you should be happy that he made this call, even though you lost this time. The only thing you can do is to make sure you don't lose even more money when he hits the river (don't call his donk shove etc.)

You should really start to study hard and play the way which is "proved to be right", not the way you "feel is right", if you understand what I mean. Also, Jared Tendler's book "Mental Game of Poker" would completely change the way you thing about poker if you took the time to read it and implement the concepts he talks about there.


Reply
Quote
pokerboy198229
Joined: 20.08.2011

Originally posted by aleasy77
Like how I write before I get to higher this stats and lose more than before and why? Too hard connected with boards? More or less cbets? Today I lose big pot because fish calls big bet on turn KQJT with KT I get AK, river typical sucks T...

How do you study? Do you read books, general strategies etc?


Reply
Quote
aleasy77
Joined: 03.03.2014

I read and analise articles with strategy blackrain79 and search how can be the newest video's strategy from this stakes.


Reply
Quote