Skip to forum
Notifications
Clear all

[Closed] 6.50$ AKo UTG

7 Posts
4 Users
0 Reactions
523 Views
Maarten84
Joined: 22.02.2008

Better to check behind on this board? Or is bet/fold the best option here?

No Limit Holdem Tournament
$6.00+$0.50
9 players
Converted at weaktight.com

Stacks:
UTG Hero (1515)
UTG+1 skitp (1590)
MP1 HitBoxSchubi (1865)
MP2 Hitman H (850)
MP3 BuyMyGucci (1285)
CO Eismann22 (1750)
BTN ketorin89 (1345)
SB aaarifleman (1495)
BB mhutchinson (1805)

Blinds: 25/50

Pre-flop: (75, 9 players) Hero is UTG K♦ A♠
Hero raises to 200, 6 folds, aaarifleman calls 175, 1 fold

Flop: 9♥ Q♦ 9♦ (450, 2 players)
aaarifleman checks, Hero bets 301, aaarifleman raises to 605, Hero folds


6 replies
LgWz
Joined: 26.05.2007

I'd make it 150 pre. Cbet looks ok, I think you can go for half pot instead of 2/3 though (one opponent, paired board, he shows weakness by checking, etc).


NickParkes
Joined: 07.07.2008

Agreed with 150 preflop... makes your c-bet cheaper... I still tend to c-bet this though, it'll be profitable longterm, but you gotta fold to the raise even though it is a common board for an aggressive villain to bluff on... As for checking behind, yeah, there is definitely an argument for it, but I think you take down the pot here too many times with a c-bet not to do it :f_grin:


Maarten84
Joined: 22.02.2008

I really prefer 4 bb's UTG at this blindlevel at these low stakes.

First, my range is really strong here, sometimes AQ, but mostly TT/JJ+ and AK. There for, inn most cases I really don't mind that the pot is a bit bigger preflop, since most of my cbets will be valuebets.

Second, I've noticed a lot of difference for some players in the way they tend to call a lot more with SC's, flush possible hands etc when you raise to 150 instead of 200/175.

Btw, when there is a limp in front of me, I do raise to 3*bb +1bb per limper.


chenny8888
Joined: 03.10.2007

Hi all,

Originally posted by LgWz
I'd make it 150 pre. Cbet looks ok, I think you can go for half pot instead of 2/3 though (one opponent, paired board, he shows weakness by checking, etc).

This. Checking behind is not good here unless you really want to induce a bluff and then call-down with A high. Our outs are too weak and too few to check and try catch them.


Maarten84
Joined: 22.02.2008

Originally posted by Maarten84
I really prefer 4 bb's UTG at this blindlevel at these low stakes.

First, my range is really strong here, sometimes AQ, but mostly TT/JJ+ and AK. There for, inn most cases I really don't mind that the pot is a bit bigger preflop, since most of my cbets will be valuebets.

Second, I've noticed a lot of difference for some players in the way they tend to call a lot more with SC's, flush possible hands etc when you raise to 150 instead of 200/175.

Btw, when there is a limp in front of me, I do raise to 3*bb +1bb per limper.

What about this?


chenny8888
Joined: 03.10.2007

Small difference but tbh I want my opponents to come along for 1/10 of their effective stack with suited connectors and the such. Makes our postflop "advantage" higher as well because we are not as easily committed etc.