Woah, great idea Emi & TT. Looks like a lot of learning is going to come my way while watching out for your journey. Too lazy to comment on your already posted hands but generally seems rather ok. I'd add some more aggression on some of those hands where you can find worse hands calling even if it is some sort of WA/WB.
@Emi: You said something about knowing you're behind and still calling. That's something I had huge problems with at past. But well, it was actually a book by Scott Fischman that made me stop doing it. He wrote that he ALWAYS trusts his instincs when sitting at a poker table. Ever since I've done the exact same thing. Btw, that was the only thing I learned from that book but it made it worth reading, so not really suggesting anyone to ever read it.
@TT: You said that "against florian19xx I'd 3-bet 99 and get it in CO vs. SB" I think that's way too loose for NL10. Loosest broke range I've seen from a reg is TT+, AQs+ and even that is SUPERloose for NL10 and that's just for the blindbattles. He's never going broke with worse pockets and I wouldn't say that he is going broke even with AQ all the time. Broke ranges at NL10 are waaaay tighter than on higher limits. It's rare to see someone going broke with QQ pre 100bb deep.
2,5bb or on BU: Tried that for 1k hands and my steal success% went down deep. So imo 3bb Bu openr is superior even when raising atc.
Also I think you are underestimating NL10 regs a bit. Obviously anyone playing NL10 is a fish but still there are decent players and most of the regs already have a clue how to play preflop.
Guess it's notable that I'm also a NL10 fish. 
Anyways, GL with the project and keep up the good work!