Originally posted by xylere
Do you really think you are good?![]()
no, im at 0 i suck at gambling.
Originally posted by xylere
Do you really think you are good?![]()
no, im at 0 i suck at gambling.
Originally posted by Puschkin81
Hi Blackmagents!If this is not a joke, you should quit poker! You are a typical gamer who will lose all his money. Stay away from casinos and gambling. It seems like you never read our strategy articles. Concerning your KK vs. 97 hand: You will win the hand in 17% of the cases. Your opponent will win it in 83% of the cases. Play this hand a hundred times and you will lose a lot of money.
Best regards,
Puschkin81
According random simulation of 20,000,000,000 games KK wins 26.5% games (if all ten players go all-in) and 43.51%(if 6 go all-in) and 82.12% if just 2 players go all-in.
so you think you can beat me because i went all in on a 9-7? I mean i bet if you were in my table you'd just sit there till you get aces king or queens..adn then i wud just fold..
i may be stupid but I've never wasted kings ace or queens.
Don't judge me over 1 play.
You havn't played wiht me. SO stfu.
Originally posted by LuckasiFiaT
Originally posted by Puschkin81
Hi Blackmagents!If this is not a joke, you should quit poker! You are a typical gamer who will lose all his money. Stay away from casinos and gambling. It seems like you never read our strategy articles. Concerning your KK vs. 97 hand: You will win the hand in 17% of the cases. Your opponent will win it in 83% of the cases. Play this hand a hundred times and you will lose a lot of money.
Best regards,
Puschkin81According random simulation of 20,000,000,000 games KK wins 26.5% games (if all ten players go all-in) and 43.51%(if 6 go all-in) and 82.12% if just 2 players go all-in.
congrats, as you see i still don't care ♦ i don't care i thought it was a good all in. until i saw kings. You think that i don't knwo about group number etc..? I do. I play agressive ot get people ot call big pots when i have monsters. ♦
lol this is still going..
clearly you're really good at both poker and roulette, lets just leave it at that? go deposit on titan and play 10+1 sng plz
Originally posted by helemaalnicks
V: Since when did roulette have "00"? I certainly don't remember that in my childhood roulette set =S
since it was invented? it has always been there i think..
There are two different types of roullete.
American and European. One of them has only one "0". The other has a "0" and a "00". Just don't remember what type got the two zeros, and what got just one.
And it would be possible to be +EV in roullete... if there wasn't a maximum bet amount, too bad there is.
Originally posted by Faye6891
And it would be possible to be +EV in roullete... if there wasn't a maximum bet amount, too bad there is.
![]()
And you must nearly have unlimited money too otherwise it won't work ♦
Explain how you play roulette +EV with a limited (but large) BR and no maximum betsize?
Originally posted by Classical
Explain how you play roulette +EV with a limited (but large) BR and no maximum betsize?
let's say you first play first for 500$, if you lose, you play for 1000$ & if you lose again, you play for 2000$ and so on, until you win and you start spinning the wheel all over again.
This can never be +EV because you will go broke at some time (maybe a long time but still) with 100% chance
Lol, you guys shall see i'll post my video's next friday of the full week, i decided ot deposit 100 or so dollars...so i'll take al ittle while..stilll figuring out bet stratagies. You'll see how i play. Then judge, what i've said is very vague...
I just go doubling your bet every time you lose, and when you win you go back to the starting bet. Supposing you place bets that pay 2-to-1, like red and black numbers. But of course, you'd need a very large bankroll compared to your starting bet.
@Faye: I understand the double-the-bet-if-you-lose system, but:
With unlimited BR and no zero on the wheel the EV is exactly 0: every time the wheel is spun, the EV is 0 (50% chance to lose, 50% chance to double-up), and since EV is a linear function, the total EV for any number of spins is 0 as well.
With unlimited BR *and* the zero on the wheel it's -EV
With limited BR it's -EV because you will go broke eventually, regardless of whether there is a zero on the wheel or not.
That's not true. If you make 100 1:1 bets it's a bigger than 50% one of them will be good. It´s a lot closer to 100% then 50% actually.