Originally posted by pleno1
why did you shove aces?
i like shove. we rep Asx a lot and on fr tables ranges are just so different. they never stack QQ pre, so he can easily have TT-QQ.
for 100bb u dont see ppl call suited conn of any sort vs a big 3b. so only way he has a flush is if he has AsQs. AsKs i think would 4b, but not sure. anyway, in sh games i usually bet turn as ppl are way more paranoid. i think in fr games though u have same fe with shoving and betting. and shoving reps more Asx so imo shove is best here. small bet looks actually stronger is he has JJ. i was still surprised not to see him call here. maybe 66-88 (with spade). althought there is no difference in 88 and QQ here, they probably still fold lower pairs.
@ KQ hand:
i can def see all line here. 3way on the flop i think u have a lot of fe vs 99 etc. so i like cbetting actually. even AQ wont raise u. its fr. as played i actually like the turn check. seems like both plrs have nothing and betting just folds out their nothing. hearts will bet and maybe JT decides to bet as well. i like c/c turn as played. river i would bet out. at this point if sb wanted to bluff, they would have f or t. we can just hope sb has JJ and calls one bet. or maybe made a 9 on the river.
i personally would bet a bit smaller here. around 28. yes its true, 28 doesnt look bluffy and 42 is the size u would chose with most of your bluffs and your value hands. but then again, we have to play their calling range and u are unknown anyway. i cant imagine 9x or TT calling 42. 27 maybe
what were your thoughts in this hand vonki?
and yeah, btw: great investment
if u see scout again, i buy all your action again