Skip to forum
Notifications
Clear all

[Closed] NL10: set

5 Posts
4 Users
0 Reactions
447 Views

Known players: (for a description of vp$ip, pfr, ats, folded bb, af, wts, wsd or hands click here)   
[tg]Position_Stack:hands/vp$ip/pfr/af/wts/ats/foldbb/w$sd;CO$4,43:///////;Hero$9,95:///////;SB$2,82:///////;[/tg]
0,05/0,10 No-Limit Hold'em (6 handed)
Hand recorder used for this poker hand: Texas Grabem 1.9 by www.pokerstrategy.com.

Preflop: Hero is BU with 8♣, 8♠
2 folds, CO raises to $0,30, Hero calls $0,30, SB calls $0,25, BB folds.

Flop: ($1,00) K♦, 2♣, 8♥ (3 players)
SB checks, CO bets $0,90, Hero calls $0,90, SB calls $0,90.

Turn: ($3,70) 6♦ (3 players)
SB bets $0,30, CO raises to $1,90, Hero raises to $8,74, SB raises to $1,62 (All-In), CO raises to $3,23 (All-In).

River: ($17,29) J♦

Final Pot: $17,29

I call the flop because the board is so dry. Push on the turn because of villains stacks. Good?


4 replies
snowylee
Joined: 27.01.2007

I think that's ok yeah. I'm not sure, but I wonder if it could be ok to call the turn to perhaps entice them both into calling, but I guess it's unnecessary when you think about the opponents at NL10 hehe.


raasz
Joined: 30.11.2007

I would play the hand the same way. Call the flopbet en raise on the turn because of the possible flushdraw. Sometimes i cold call another bet on the turn, but only on a dry board and against 1 opponent.
Only one question: why do you go all-in for almost $9 when your opponets only have something like $3 left? This way it costs your more rake. On this low limits it doesn't mean much, but on the higher limits it can make a difference.


Do they charge me rake for that? I assumed that I only pay rake for the amount villain can call when he calls. But maybe that is naive of me...


Thorsten77
Joined: 28.05.2006

well played