Comments? Thanks.
Grabbed by Holdem Manager
NL Holdem $100(BB) Replayer
SB ($1,900)
BB ($1,940)
UTG ($3,000)
UTG+1 ($2,000)
UTG+2 ($2,310)
MP1 ($1,920)
MP2 ($3,210)
Hero ($1,830)
BTN ($1,890)
Dealt to Hero 6♥ 6♣
UTG calls $100, fold, UTG+2 calls $100, fold, fold, Hero raises to $1,830 (AI),
I think that you need 88+ on that spot. Sometimes you will get called by AA,AK,QQ,JJ. Many fish loves to make that move on UTG. The second limper clearly have a weak range. So for me, the problem is the utg limper.
If the limpers were from middle and late position i would make that move too.
Please correct me if I'm wrong. 
Originally posted by Buhas
I think that you need 88+ on that spot. Sometimes you will get called by AA,AK,QQ,JJ. Many fish loves to make that move on UTG. The second limper clearly have a weak range. So for me, the problem is the utg limper.If the limpers were from middle and late position i would make that move too.
Please correct me if I'm wrong.
Are you saying that good regs never limp premium hands from UTG, when there are so many opponents left to act behind them?
You cannot find good regs on micro too often. On those limits people tend to call too much, what makes that play not soo good. Tbh I don't like that move at any limit.
Even is UTG is a fishy player who limp / folds at high blind levels and UTG+1 is dead money for the most part since he limps behind, I would fold there.
The reason is that you have 3 people left to act behind you and the fact that you are too deep, hence your risk - reward ratio is too low.
I would advice you to omit this spots, since they are high variance and you can always find a better spot.
@TheGuyFromCIA: Solid regulars never open limp, let alone at high blinds, the reason is that this play is impossible to balance and this opens them for exploitation by other regs.
