Skip to forum
Notifications
Clear all

JJ 3-bet CO vs BU

11 Posts
8 Users
0 Reactions
1,023 Views
crazyguy
Joined: 22.02.2008

Full Tilt, $0.05/$0.10 No Limit Hold'em Cash, Rush, 6 Players
Poker Tools Powered By Holdem Manager - The Ultimate Poker Software Suite.

SB: $12.34 (123.4 bb)
BB: $73.41 (734.1 bb)
UTG: $18.38 (183.8 bb)
MP: $21.61 (216.1 bb)
CO: $39.90 (399 bb)
Hero (BTN): $13.91 (139.1 bb)

Preflop: Hero is BTN with J J
2 folds, CO raises to $0.30, Hero raises to $0.80, 2 folds, CO calls $0.50

Flop: ($1.75) 3 6 7 (2 players)
CO checks, Hero bets $0.80, CO calls $0.80

Turn: ($3.35) Q (2 players)
CO checks, Hero bets $1.95, CO calls $1.95

River: ($7.25) 8 (2 players)
CO bets $4.35, Hero ???

Results:

Spoiler

$7.25 pot ($0.40 rake)
Final Board: 3 6 7 Q 8
CO mucked and won $6.85 ($3.30 net)
Hero mucked J J and lost (-$3.55 net)

does villain ever do this with worse?


Reply
Quote
10 replies
Aerox232
Joined: 28.04.2011

both draws get ther, there Q on board, only hands we beat calling flop and turn are TT,99, but i guess he would checked them down, so fold here is correct imo


Reply
Quote
caltabiano
Joined: 09.03.2007

Yeah, definitely fold... he c/c you twice, and bets when the draw gets there, plus he could show up with stuff like 87


Reply
Quote
zoty79
Joined: 31.03.2010

I actually like your bet on the turn, because i think you would also bet your bluffs on the turn. But the river is definitly a fold vs. this guy. All draws got there. And people bluff less often with this line. So when his bluffs you, so be it.


Reply
Quote
nitrol
Joined: 24.07.2010

On nl10 his line is mostly for value. So folding is right.
Draws got there and we cannot call.


Reply
Quote
la55i
Joined: 27.01.2013

Fold is good. Villain doesn't bluff here often.


Reply
Quote
YohanN7
Joined: 15.06.2009

Why bet less than half-pot on the flop and plenty more than half pot on turn? The other way around is much better (two spades are a very small part of his range), and you are essentially not value betting on the turn.


Reply
Quote
crazyguy
Joined: 22.02.2008

It is standard in 3-bet pots to bet between 1/3 and 1/2 pot on the flop. the turncard hit my range much better than his so that's why i'm am betting slighty more than half pot there.


Reply
Quote
Hesticus
Joined: 24.06.2008

Would also bet a bit more OTF than OTT. Further, I would've played the same and fold OTR.


Reply
Quote
nitrol
Joined: 24.07.2010

Originally posted by crazyguy
It is standard in 3-bet pots to bet between 1/3 and 1/2 pot on the flop. the turncard hit my range much better than his so that's why i'm am betting slighty more than half pot there.

Standard cbet size for flop is 1/2 in 3b pot. 1/3 is for 4b...or mw on dry boards where you can easily go AI by river.


Reply
Quote
YohanN7
Joined: 15.06.2009

Originally posted by crazyguy
...
does villain ever do this with worse?

Yes, when he is bluffing. That river is a pretty good card to bluff on, and not all draws got there. He can easily have a hand like 9♦:8♦:. You should still fold J♣:J♥: imo.

Bet sizes should be such that villain cannot profitably draw to beat you if you are ahead (in which case you are rooting for a call), or such that the EV for a bluff is maximized and higher than zero (in which case you are rooting for a fold unless you think you can profitably double or triple barrel, in which case you are again rooting for a call). Possibly stack depth has an influence, but it doesn't rule alone. Screw everything that is advertised as standard. "Standard" may be good for some hands and boards (like perhaps flopped nuts exactly 100bb deep before the hand).


Reply
Quote