Skip to forum
Search
Forums
Poker Strategy and ...
No Limit
Hand discussions fo...
98o top two pair on...
 
Notifications
Clear all

98o top two pair on the turn

 
Hand discussions for No Limit
Last Post by YohanN7 11 years ago
8 Posts
6 Users
0 Reactions
1,128 Views
RSS
HiImOdds
HiImOdds
Joined: 19.11.2015
Posts: 23
26.11.2015, 16:38

Poker Stars, $0.01/$0.02 No Limit Hold'em Cash, 6 Players
Poker Tools Powered By Holdem Manager - The Ultimate Poker Software Suite.

SB: $1.42 (71 bb)
BB: $2 (100 bb)
UTG: $2.31 (115.5 bb)
Hero (MP): $2 (100 bb)
CO: $1.71 (85.5 bb)
BTN: $2.25 (112.5 bb)

Preflop: Hero is MP with 8 9
UTG folds, Hero raises to $0.06, CO calls $0.06, 2 folds, BB calls $0.04

Flop: ($0.19) 2 9 2 (3 players)
BB bets $0.08, Hero calls $0.08, CO calls $0.08

Turn: ($0.43) 8 (3 players)
BB bets $0.20, Hero calls $0.20, CO folds

River: ($0.83) 6 (2 players)
BB bets $0.78, Hero calls $0.78

Results:

Spoiler

$2.39 pot ($0.13 rake)
Final Board: 2 9 2 8 6
BB showed 6 6 and won $2.26 ($1.14 net)
Hero mucked 8 9 and lost (-$1.12 net)

I played this too passively? I'm definetely not expecting him to show 66


Reply
Quote
7 replies
la55i
la55i
Joined: 27.01.2013
Posts: 8,896
26.11.2015, 16:44

Calling down is one way to play this. I would have raised OTT. That 66 is definitely unexpected.. You got unlucky :f_cry:


Blog :spade: Private Coaching :spade: Website

Reply
Quote
HiImOdds
HiImOdds
Joined: 19.11.2015
Posts: 23
26.11.2015, 16:56

I think he would have done the same with hands like Q9 K9 A9. 2x would not have called pre I think. TT+ would probably have 3-bet preflop. I can't really see much that beats me here.


Reply
Quote
nitrol
nitrol
Joined: 24.07.2010
Posts: 11,244
26.11.2015, 17:00

Originally posted by la55i
Calling down is one way to play this. I would have raised OTT. That 66 is definitely unexpected.. You got unlucky :f_cry:
Raising is a bit loose, imo. Overpairs have 2P too.


Reply
Quote
HiImOdds
HiImOdds
Joined: 19.11.2015
Posts: 23
26.11.2015, 17:02

Originally posted by nitrol

Originally posted by la55i
Calling down is one way to play this. I would have raised OTT. That 66 is definitely unexpected.. You got unlucky :f_cry:
Raising is a bit loose, imo. Overpairs have 2P too.

The question is: which overpairs don't 3bet pre? Maybe TT, JJ+ definetely not.


Reply
Quote
Dadramel
Dadramel
Joined: 10.08.2014
Posts: 1,713
26.11.2015, 17:19

Originally posted by HiImOdds

Originally posted by nitrol

Originally posted by la55i
Calling down is one way to play this. I would have raised OTT. That 66 is definitely unexpected.. You got unlucky :f_cry:
Raising is a bit loose, imo. Overpairs have 2P too.

The question is: which overpairs don't 3bet pre? Maybe TT, JJ+ definetely not.

He might have x8 as well as x9 even taking card removal effect into account, plus micro players are usually afraid of playing high pairs oop, then you may see them squeezing less likely. The thing with SC is they lose playability if played oop or in single pots. Since you've had him on the right, just c will do the job.


Reply
Quote
_Anonymous_
_Anonymous_
28.11.2015, 20:29

Calling down here isn't bad. I probably would have raised on the flop though and you probably would have taken the pot. You just got unlucky on the river.


Reply
Quote
YohanN7
YohanN7
Joined: 15.06.2009
Posts: 4,700
30.11.2015, 12:06

You have a bluff-catcher. Treat it as such and don't raise with it.


There's always going to be one fly in the ointment - Boomer2k10

Reply
Quote
Forum Jump:
  Previous Topic
Next Topic