AQs gets 3bet & flops TP

imo fold is best vs this specific opponent, maybe 4b/fold, calling is the worst option here i think

Calling pre should be fine. Calling flop with TPTK and BDFD is ok. We can fold turn. WP imo. W34z3l's BTNvsUTG 3bet range is KK+,A5s-A3s,KJs,AJo,KQo. That is 4% and villains 3bet stat is 5%. No need to consider him so tight that folding would be better imo.

Shove flop (x/s)

Ap x/r AI otf. TP/TK on such a wet board with given SPR is for sure strong enough to get it in here (you're also blocking some of his value combos (AA) and not blocking possible FDs).

3bet stat vs early position? TOtal 5% 3b stat can be 2% 3betting vs ep and 11 restealing from blinds vs BU. With that being said it might be skewed up and is not right. So once again, whats 3bet stat vs ep or mp? in position?

Originally posted by la55i
Calling pre should be fine. Calling flop with TPTK and BDFD is ok. We can fold turn. WP imo. W34z3l's BTNvsUTG 3bet range is KK+,A5s-A3s,KJs,AJo,KQo. That is 4% and villains 3bet stat is 5%. No need to consider him so tight that folding would be better imo.

Bu is 3 betting vs utg so when his overall 3b stat is 5% in this situation it will be 2-2.5 max. Calling vs that tight range is not fine.

Originally posted by AlvisR
3bet stat vs early position? TOtal 5% 3b stat can be 2% 3betting vs ep and 11 restealing from blinds vs BU. With that being said it might be skewed up and is not right. So once again, whats 3bet stat vs ep or mp? in position?

91 hands is not enough to look at positional 3bet stats. Might be even too little to say what villains overall 3bet stat really is.

Originally posted by nitrol

Originally posted by la55i
Calling pre should be fine. Calling flop with TPTK and BDFD is ok. We can fold turn. WP imo. W34z3l's BTNvsUTG 3bet range is KK+,A5s-A3s,KJs,AJo,KQo. That is 4% and villains 3bet stat is 5%. No need to consider him so tight that folding would be better imo.

Bu is 3 betting vs utg so when his overall 3b stat is 5% in this situation it will be 2-2.5 max. Calling vs that tight range is not fine.

BTN looks a bit fishy because of his stack size. We can't know if he is aware of positions. We can't know if his 2% 3bet range contains bluffs or not. What if he is 3betting QQ+,AJo, then we have 50% equity. I'm not folding based on stats from 91 hands.

Originally posted by la55i

Originally posted by AlvisR
3bet stat vs early position? TOtal 5% 3b stat can be 2% 3betting vs ep and 11 restealing from blinds vs BU. With that being said it might be skewed up and is not right. So once again, whats 3bet stat vs ep or mp? in position?

91 hands is not enough to look at positional 3bet stats. Might be even too little to say what villains overall 3bet stat really is.

Why do you use it in your first post then?

Originally posted by la55i

Originally posted by nitrol

Originally posted by la55i
Calling pre should be fine. Calling flop with TPTK and BDFD is ok. We can fold turn. WP imo. W34z3l's BTNvsUTG 3bet range is KK+,A5s-A3s,KJs,AJo,KQo. That is 4% and villains 3bet stat is 5%. No need to consider him so tight that folding would be better imo.

Bu is 3 betting vs utg so when his overall 3b stat is 5% in this situation it will be 2-2.5 max. Calling vs that tight range is not fine.

BTN looks a bit fishy because of his stack size. We can't know if he is aware of positions. We can't know if his 2% 3bet range contains bluffs or not. What if he is 3betting QQ+,AJo, then we have 50% equity. I'm not folding based on stats from 91 hands.

After you reached that his stack is short, think how many bluffs will there be? Why do you call and what flops do you want to hit. I think in this case call is not the best option.

O, I forgot, what if villain plays shortstack strategy?

Originally posted by nitrol

Originally posted by la55i

Originally posted by AlvisR
3bet stat vs early position? TOtal 5% 3b stat can be 2% 3betting vs ep and 11 restealing from blinds vs BU. With that being said it might be skewed up and is not right. So once again, whats 3bet stat vs ep or mp? in position?

91 hands is not enough to look at positional 3bet stats. Might be even too little to say what villains overall 3bet stat really is.

Why do you use it in your first post then?

Do you think 91 hands is enough? Usually you are the first one to say that sample size is too small... I used it as a guideline. Vs unknown I think we can call, if we use that 5% overall I think we could call(?) BUT the sample size is too small to really look at 3bet stat. It might be 3% or 8% really.

Originally posted by nitrol

Originally posted by la55i

Originally posted by nitrol

Originally posted by la55i
Calling pre should be fine. Calling flop with TPTK and BDFD is ok. We can fold turn. WP imo. W34z3l's BTNvsUTG 3bet range is KK+,A5s-A3s,KJs,AJo,KQo. That is 4% and villains 3bet stat is 5%. No need to consider him so tight that folding would be better imo.

Bu is 3 betting vs utg so when his overall 3b stat is 5% in this situation it will be 2-2.5 max. Calling vs that tight range is not fine.

BTN looks a bit fishy because of his stack size. We can't know if he is aware of positions. We can't know if his 2% 3bet range contains bluffs or not. What if he is 3betting QQ+,AJo, then we have 50% equity. I'm not folding based on stats from 91 hands.

After you reached that his stack is short, think how many bluffs will there be? Why do you call and what flops do you want to hit. I think in this case call is not the best option.

I think there is enough bluffs. Do you think there is none? I would like to hit nut flush, FD, A, Q + BDFD etc.. Could we 4bet pre or do you think folding is the only option?

Originally posted by nitrol
O, I forgot, what if villain plays shortstack strategy?

What if he doesn't? Imo SSS is not so common these days.

Originally posted by la55i

Originally posted by nitrol

Originally posted by la55i

Originally posted by AlvisR
3bet stat vs early position? TOtal 5% 3b stat can be 2% 3betting vs ep and 11 restealing from blinds vs BU. With that being said it might be skewed up and is not right. So once again, whats 3bet stat vs ep or mp? in position?

91 hands is not enough to look at positional 3bet stats. Might be even too little to say what villains overall 3bet stat really is.

Why do you use it in your first post then?

Do you think 91 hands is enough? Usually you are the first one to say that sample size is too small... I used it as a guideline. Vs unknown I think we can call, if we use that 5% overall I think we could call(?) BUT the sample size is too small to really look at 3bet stat. It might be 3% or 8% really.

It doesn't matter what I think. Why do you use 5% as a base for your first post and afterwards you tell sample size is small.
I think sample size is small but if you read carefully what other components form my opinion you will not write meaningless posts.

How many bluffs will have a halfstack, 3betting vs utg? Remember he isn't a regular fullstack villain.
It is up to you to decide whether to push (as you cannot fold vs aggression) or fold preflop. In this particular case I prefer folding, call me a nit.
If villain was fullstack the call has more reason, there will be enough stack to try and outplay villain Postflop.

Originally posted by la55i

Originally posted by nitrol
O, I forgot, what if villain plays shortstack strategy?

What if he doesn't? Imo SSS is not so common these days.

I would not bet on that... still face good shortstackers.

Originally posted by la55i

Originally posted by AlvisR
3bet stat vs early position? TOtal 5% 3b stat can be 2% 3betting vs ep and 11 restealing from blinds vs BU. With that being said it might be skewed up and is not right. So once again, whats 3bet stat vs ep or mp? in position?

91 hands is not enough to look at positional 3bet stats. Might be even too little to say what villains overall 3bet stat really is.

Congrats on categorizing him as unknown. So now how do you define unknown 3bettors? Looser or tighter overall? How would you like to play vs unknowns - looser or tighter?

Tighter of course.