Should i´ve slowed down on the turn?

A pair +draw is normally a xc on turn. Or I maybe wrong.

No. I like the bet on the turn. You had top pair/kicker, and the nut flush draw. Others might disagree, but I would have bet the turn in that situation too.

In fact, betting sounds like it. We can charge 1spade hands that are growing deadifanother spade hits.

In such spots I expect that you find as I do that the SB or MP will actually donk this flop a lot, and then basically fold everything once they check.

My point is that in my personal experience if they x/call they mostly have very weak hands like a Jack or 98 that will fold on the turn vs a bet.

So in my personal opinion I don't think I can value bet the turn since I don't believe I will be called by worse. Even if GTO is bet bet, because players donk on the flop so often, they basically have hands that are too weak to call a turn bet after x/c on flop.

Then of course they occasionally show up with a two pairs+, so when you get called on the turn you should be highly suspicious in general. That's how I view the situation.

Let me know if you find this useful or not or agree/disagree.

I like double barreling this. You have TPTK and A♠: which reduces his flush combos imo.

Well, i kind of feel that i should bet the turn to make him pay for draws and i have the nut flushdraw that i can hit on the river.
But i'm still not sure.
What if he'd checked the river, would you bet and hope to get called by a Jx or something or should i check?

Originally posted by NothingIsForSho
In such spots I expect that you find as I do that the SB or MP will actually donk this flop a lot, and then basically fold everything once they check.

My point is that in my personal experience if they x/call they mostly have very weak hands like a Jack or 98 that will fold on the turn vs a bet.

So in my personal opinion I don't think I can value bet the turn since I don't believe I will be called by worse. Even if GTO is bet bet, because players donk on the flop so often, they basically have hands that are too weak to call a turn bet after x/c on flop.

Then of course they occasionally show up with a two pairs+, so when you get called on the turn you should be highly suspicious in general. That's how I view the situation.

Let me know if you find this useful or not or agree/disagree.

But don't you think that because he's so passive he could have limped with lets say AJ or J7 or something?
He would probably call 2 Streets if he's a callingstation.

Well that is only 19 hands so we can't draw any conclusions.

True