Thanks, <3, for saying what I would have said.
belthazorrrr, if you look carefully the green and red lines meet up at the far right hand side of the graph. So actually I'm at EV. But in the past I have run over 50 BI under EV over a similar - for example:
Liar Dice – Don't Panic: It's just a Dream
(See the entry entitled "Taking Bets")
Speaking of which - and most of you won't remember this - but I am now in position to reveal the winner of that bet which I made over a year ago. Here is my 2010 graph at the 36s Full Ring tournaments, for reference:

So, the biggest gap was a EV difference of 52.1 BI ($1875). The winner of the competition was the interestingly named, "Genetals", who guessed 53 BI - just 0.9 of a buyin off. Well done! I don't think he is active anymore but I will happily provide an hour's free sweating/coaching to him if he reappears!
Anyway, here's hoping I run better in SH...
Finally,
@DeMarcohsp,
Tim why did you switch from rush sh to sng's ? I am currently playing NL 25 sh rush and I remeber you were playing NL 50 sh maybe you share with what changed your mind
Basically, I was a SSS grinder to begin. Then SnGs for ages. I switched to BSS because I learnt that, 1. there is an upper limit to winrate at SnGs (due to lack of games and 'solvability' of SnG play and 2. because of low ROIs, variance can be disgusting. I played BSS for many months, before discovering that because there are so many decent, non-spewy, regs... my winrate was tiny and the variances was, you guessed it, DISGUSTING. See:
Liar Dice – Don't Panic: It's just a Dream
So I am back to playing SnGs because although variance is likely no different, for some reason I tilt less at SnGs and so I play slightly better and and enjoy them more.
-Tim64


