Skip to forum
Notifications
Clear all

JJ - should I have been in the hand ???

4 Posts
2 Users
0 Reactions
433 Views

Very early, no info on villain, $3.50 on Pokerstars

Known Players:
MP2: 1130 - 57 bb
MP3: 2380 - 119 bb
CO: 1460 - 73 bb
BU: 660 - 33 bb
SB: 1790 - 90 bb
BB: 1580 - 79 bb

10/20 No Limit Hold'em Tournament (6 Handed)
Hand recorder for this hand: PokerStrategy.com SideKick 1.0.51221.1

Preflop: Hero is CO with J♥, J♠
SB posts small blind (10), BB posts big blind (20), 2 folds, Hero raises for 60, BU folds, SB 3-bets 290, BB folds, Hero calls

Flop: (620 - 31 bb) J♦, T♠, 7♠ (2 Players)
SB bets 1490, Hero calls, SB gets uncalled back (330)

Turn: (2940 - 147 bb) 6♦ (2 Players)

River: (2940 - 147 bb) Q♣ (2 Players)


Reply
Quote
3 replies
Anto11
Joined: 25.02.2011

Hello Gentari,

Preflop:

should I have been in the hand

No .
Without info and dynamics with villain there is no need to be involve more in the hand after he 3-bets us. We got easy fold. I would stack of only with QQ+ here against unknown.

Flop:

As played, easy call with nuts.

Best regards,
Antoan :pokerface:


Reply
Quote

Thanks Antoan,

Really need to keep these hands out of my game.

Are you calling a smaller 3bet pre, say 160-200?


Reply
Quote
Anto11
Joined: 25.02.2011

Hi,

We can call only a min raise here. On other 3-bet sizes we should fold. If we call general we are calling for set but we are not getting good enough odds to do it. In this limits where there are many fishes we should play more careful. There is no need to be involve in marginal situations. There will be much better situations to take the chips from villain.

Best regards,
Antoan :pokerface:


Reply
Quote