So these actually interested me, but there was something odd I noticed. Hands like 64s are in group 6, which I suppose is reasonable. However, when I look at 65s I see that it is in group 7? So why is 65s in group 7 while 64s is in group 6 (this also applies to a few other hands)? It just doesn't make much sense to me, really.
Notifications
Clear all
General Poker Discussion
2
Posts
2
Users
0
Reactions
460
Views
1 reply
sklansky's hand group is an old table, it is good but has been modified slightly in recent years.