[Closed] $15, 53s as shortstack on BB

Cause with extra 150 chips from antes in pot you have 300 true BB instead of 200. handconverter.com uses M when antes come to play but I prefer true BBs cause it's easier to count.

About the hand.

From ICM Explorer:

Equity needed: 34,99%
Chip odds: 32,32%
Risk premium: 2,67%

You're very little risk averse so I would call here. Especially when next hand you'd have 1,5 true bb left behind after posting small blind so you're even more screwed

@ dydukas: Aaaa, thanks for the enlightening about the converter

About the hand, yea I'm obviously not expecting FE or anything like that but I will probably get a better hand and I was thinking I'd rather let go of the extra 400-ish chips cos this hand is really weak.

Well, if we can expect the shortie to push nash here then I'm obviously making a mistake.

Question is that - according to your experiences - how regs act when they have a small stack AND they push into an even smaller, committed-ish stack.

At least in my games I think short regs push wider into another shortie in bb. And it's profitable cause if a fish is bb he doesn't adjust when blinds are high. A lot fish don't even understand when they have to call any 2 due to odds. And against other regs they don't adjust that much on low stakes. Stars may be different cause skill level is better there on the whole I guess.

Hi all,

Originally posted by dydukas
At least in my games I think short regs push wider into another shortie in bb. And it's profitable cause if a fish is bb he doesn't adjust when blinds are high. A lot fish don't even understand when they have to call any 2 due to odds. And against other regs they don't adjust that much on low stakes. Stars may be different cause skill level is better there on the whole I guess.

I agree with this entirely. A reg that recognises you may tighten up a bit here but for the most part regs are going to be wider than Nash in this spot.