Skip to forum
Notifications
Clear all

[Closed] NL100SH, set 55

5 Posts
4 Users
0 Reactions
67 Views

PokerStars: Hold'em No Limit ($0.50/$1.00) - 2008/02/12 - 09:48:35 (ET)

HERO (BU) ($98.50 in chips)
SB ($20.85 in chips)
BB ($102.85 in chips)
UTG ($12.50 in chips)
MP ($127.25 in chips)
CO ($103 in chips)

HOLE CARDS
Dealt to HERO [5:d 5:s]
2 folds
CO: raises $3 to $4
HERO: calls $4
SB: calls $3.50
BB: folds

FLOP [Q:s 5:c 3:d]
SB: checks
CO: bets $9
HERO: calls $9 (slowplaying good here?)
SB: folds
TURN [Q:s 5:c 3:d] [4:h]
CO: checks
HERO: bets $20 (betting ok here?)
CO: calls $20
RIVER [Q:s 5:c 3:d 4:h] [A:h]
CO: checks
HERO: bets $20, valuebetting ok here? And is it enough?


4 replies
swissmoumout
Joined: 24.02.2007

either call or raise on the flop is good imo. turn bet is good, but as played I'd bet the river a bit more, say 45-50$ in a 70$ pot (if it is 70$... not sure ^^)


Looks ok to me.

This flop looks relatively safe - only serious threat I see here is 64s in SB, and QQ in CO.

River small bet looks suspicious ("please, call me!"). I`d bet 2/3 of pot, sometimes potsize against players who don`t fold top-pair


uh, ok. I know I shouldve bet more, but the ace looked so scary, and the wheeldraw too, you reckon hed call a 50 bet? Then I made a mistake, sklansky did tell me to bet more here...


Thorsten77
Joined: 28.05.2006

Flop/Turn looks ok, but bet more on the river (at least 1/2 PS)