Skip to forum
Notifications
Clear all

[Closed] PLO10 SH Second nut Flush on river facing pot-sized lead from tight-passive villain

7 Posts
3 Users
0 Reactions
898 Views
blackops888
Joined: 25.04.2010

This was somewhat an interesting situation. I had a very LAG image at the table, so maybe he was trying to level me, but I don't really know.

Villain had 24/6/1.5 (VPIP/PFR/AF) stats, but his AF distribution on flop, turn and river was 0.5, 1.0 and infinite, respectivelly.

I folded because I thought he might actually be drawing to the nut flush all the way long. Another thing is that all broadway cards except from the A were either out there or on my hand, so I figured he was not doing that with a 9-high flush.

An interesting info is that he snap bet into me... I mean... my display barely shown the Ts to me and his pot bet was already there. Real ninja style bet, indeed. _confused:

IPoker Network $10.00 Pot Limit Omaha Hi - 6 players - View hand 1405351
DeucesCracked Poker Videos Hand History Converter

MP: $10.14
CO: $10.00
BTN: $7.18
SB: $6.17
Hero (BB): $17.47
UTG: $9.67

Pre Flop: ($0.15) Hero is BB with K♠ 3♣ 5♠ Q♠
4 folds, SB raises to $0.30, Hero calls $0.20

Flop: ($0.60) J♠ 9♣ 2♠ (2 players)
SB checks, Hero bets $0.40, SB calls $0.40

Turn: ($1.40) 6♦ (2 players)
SB checks, Hero bets $0.80, SB calls $0.80

River: ($3.00) T♠ (2 players)
SB bets $3.00, Hero folds

Final Pot: $3.00
SB wins $2.80
(Rake: $0.20)


6 replies
Jelieva
Joined: 08.03.2009

as I'm a fish I would never fold here, even vs passive player
cos you have 3 :spade: and 3 :spade: on board
he would play set or str8 the same way


Ribbo
Joined: 25.06.2010

Snap bets are typically bluffs in my experience. He is trying to make you believe he has no decision to make because he has the nuts. I would never fold in this spot with 3 spades in my hand. I'm going to be good enough of the time for this to be a call.


blackops888
Joined: 25.04.2010

Originally posted by Ribbo
Snap bets are typically bluffs in my experience. He is trying to make you believe he has no decision to make because he has the nuts. I would never fold in this spot with 3 spades in my hand. I'm going to be good enough of the time for this to be a call.

I tend to agree with you... but at the same time... ah, I lost so much with the second nut flush.

When people bet that big even with the nuts, they cannot expect to be called, right? Maybe he was on a programmed bluff, just waiting for any spade to fire a pot sized bet...


Ribbo
Joined: 25.06.2010

When you have the second nuts in this spot, there is a 20% chance one of your 5 opponents was the nut flush.

4 of your opponents folded before the river, and the one who possibly has it is still in the hand, but it's still a 20% chance he has the nuts at this point (assuming nobody folds a nut flush draw on that board)


blackops888
Joined: 25.04.2010

Originally posted by Ribbo
When you have the second nuts in this spot, there is a 20% chance one of your 5 opponents was the nut flush.

4 of your opponents folded before the river, and the one who possibly has it is still in the hand, but it's still a 20% chance he has the nuts at this point (assuming nobody folds a nut flush draw on that board)

Hum... nice one. But where does this 20% come from?

If it is right I am good 80% of the time, which almost always leads to a call on the river in PLO when HU and villain bets pot, right?


Ribbo
Joined: 25.06.2010

Originally posted by blackops888

Hum... nice one. But where does this 20% come from?

There are 20 cards dealt between your 5 opponents. If the ace is out there, the chance of it being suited is under 50%. Over all it works out that one of your opponents is dealt a suited ace 20% of the time in this situation.

Then just assume that that opponent will be the one seeing the river with you.

If it is right I am good 80% of the time, which almost always leads to a call on the river in PLO when HU and villain bets pot, right?

Without specific reads on your opponent, yes.