Known players:
[tg]Position_Stack:hands/vp$ip/RaisePreflop/AF/WTS/ORL/BBvsSteal/W$SD;Hero$57.2:///////;BU$51.1:62/8/6/-/25/0/-/0;[/tg]
0.25/0.5 No-Limit Hold'em (9 handed)
Hand recorder used for this poker hand: PokerStrategy.com Elephant 0.102 by www.pokerstrategy.com.
Preflop: Hero is CO with 2♠, 2♣
5 folds, Hero raises to $2.00, BU raises to $5.75, 2 folds, Hero calls $3.75.
Flop: ($12.25) Q♦, 7♥, 2♥ (2 players)
Hero bets $9.3, BU raises to $45.35 (All-In), Hero calls $36.05.
Turn: ($102.95) Q♣
River: ($102.95) Q♠ (2 players)
Final Pot: $102.95
Results follow (highlight to see):
Hero shows a full-house, queens full of deuces (2s 2c)
BU shows (5h 3h)
Hero wins with a full-house, queens full of deuces (2s 2c)
First, I have left the results in as they invalidate my read and my rational for playing the hand and serve as a reminder - 62 hands is not a reliable analysis of someone's play style.
I re-called the $3.75 to draw at a set with around 14-1 (2 units in the pot, 12 more to come in his stack). My basis for this is our read on the villain here is a rock - 8 Vpip 6 PFR 0 3bet. Based on a larger read I would already be placing his 3bet range as AA, KK, which are paying our set every time.
Thoughts? I am starting to lean towards this recall being far too loose, especially OP with such a thin database read (60 hands).
The results are pretty funny.
