Many people misunderstand OCD the condition with "OCD" the cartoonish behavior. When people think of someone who is "OCDing", they think of someone who is hyperfocused on one thing. If someone, for example, is really engrossed in an activity, it is common slang to say that that person is "OCDing". By that definition, OCD would be almost like a good thing, an ability to become really hyperfocused on one thing. Unfortunately, that is not what OCD is at all.
Another common misunderstanding is that people with OCD just have to have things in neat rows or they must wash their hands 5000 times a day. While these behaviors are common signs of someone who has OCD, those specific behaviors are only half the picture.
The truth is that there are many kinds of OCD. WHile there are many kinds of OCD, they all have a common root. I like to think of the root of OCD as three parts...
1) The obsession... An obsession is something that you know is not reasonable or rational but that you cannot control from entering in your head. As a result of its seemingly unshakeable persistance, one ruminates on these irrational thoughts and attaches an absurdly high value and importance upon them. To clarify, people with OCD know that their obsessions are not rational. These obsessions are just really hard to get rid of and enter the mind automatically.
2) The compulsion... A compulsion is a behavior that one does because the person with OCD feels that it will ease the anxiety of the obsession. Some compulsions seem "natural", like constantly checking the door because of the obsession with the possibility of burglars. Some compulsions seem more bizarre, like someone who feels that by tapping a door three times he will avert a plane crash. Again, people with OCD really do KNOW that these things are ridiculous, but their brains do not let them feel anything but deep anxiety (that sometimes feels painful) unless they give in and perform the compulsion. It should be noted that most people with OCD are of above average intelligence. It makes sense because there is often very complex thinking going on in the mind of someone who is battling with obsessions and compulsions they seemingly can't control.
3) The "Pull"... This is the degree of force that the compulsion has. In other words, I may obsess over the car lights being on while I am driving in the day time, but my ability to give in to the obsession and thus perform the compulsion depends on how much "pull" I feel from the OCD to actually check the switch for the tenth time in a minute. During periods of elevated stress or agitation, the "pull" is much higher then if one is relaxed. Also, the amount of "pull" is conditioned behaviorally. The compulsions reinforce the obsessions, they do NOT actually get rid of the anxiety. When I check the car lights, I may feel a very small twinge of relief from the obsessions for a fleeting second, but in the long run by giving in to the compulsion, I actually provide the obsession with an open door and an open invitation to come back stronger.
My particular kind of OCD... My OCD is of two kinds. First, I am a "checker", meaning that there are many things that I feel I need to "check" (I will not provide a list of all the things I need to check, as I think that would be too much information
). Also, I am a
"pure O" worrier, meaning that I perceive almost anything as a threat. I get bombarded on a minute by minute basis with obsessions of harm (physical, emotional, social etc etc) if I am under any kind of stress. If you were to meet me on the street, you would never know that all of this is going on in my head. I seem, in many ways, like an average guy.
How this relates to poker...
With that explanation out of the way, I feel like I can now talk about what I wanted to talk about, which is how my OCD impairs my ability to play poker. When I am playing my "A" game, I am usually relaxed, so there isn't too much OCD "noise" in my head. I can make what I think are the correct decisions and feel good about my play even if I lose.
If I am playing my "B" game, it can quickly deteriorate into my "C" game if I am not careful and if I do not manage my agitation level so my OCD does not start fueling my tilt.
I will provide one example now (I will provide more as time goes on) of a horrible play on my part and how my OCD helped my bad decision making. Also, I took a shot at NL10 while playing some NL5 and lost a few buyins, so now I am playing NL5 exclusively until my BR is healthy enough for another shot. Anywayz...
Ugh, the converter isn't working so I'll just give the relevant details. I had AK in the BB. The BTN open raised, I three bet, he called. I caught an Ace on a dry, rainbow board. I bet a bit over half pot. He called. A blank on the turn. I bet again, he called. A card hits that would complete an inside straight but thinking that no one would call two streets with an inside draw, I settled on checking because I was nervous about a set. He bets a bit over pot. Now...
1) I know I am beat.
2) I really do know I am beat.
3) I became obsessed with the idea that I was being bluffed (it WAS more than pot) even though I KNEW I was beat.
4) This led to absolutely NEEDING to know what he had. Needing to know what he had, even though I was obsessed with the idea of being bluffed, was "pulling me".
5) I had a disagreement with my wife earlier so I was not playing my "A" game.
6) Even though I KNEW #1 and #2, it became more important to me to call and lose money because I felt it would get rid of the anxiety I felt over #3 and #4. Having experienced #5 did not help matters.
7) I made the choice to call, but given #3, #4, and #5, it did not feel like I had any choice but to call and lose money.
He had the inside straight.
You may say to yourself, "This sequence happens to bad players and they do not have OCD, maybe you are just a bad player." Fair enough. I think the difference is #1 and #2 and that I felt I didn't have a choice. The "pull" was too strong. It was more important to me to lose money and feed my obsession with being bluffed and needing to know what he had, even though I knew I was beat, than make the right play. And the whole time, I was totally aware of what was going on. I think that is the difference.