Grabbed by Holdem Manager
NL Holdem $50(BB) Replayer
Hero ($2,125)
BB ($1,700)
UTG ($1,875)
UTG+1 ($1,505)
CO ($1,295)
BTN ($500)
Dealt to Hero 4♠ 2♣
fold, UTG+1 raises to $100, CO calls $100, fold, fold, fold
FLOP ($275) 8♣ J♠ 9♦
UTG+1 bets $100, CO calls $100
TURN ($475) 8♣ J♠ 9♦ 5♣
UTG+1 checks, CO checks
RIVER ($475) 8♣ J♠ 9♦ 5♣ 9♥
UTG+1 checks, CO bets $175, UTG+1 calls $175
Spoiler
CO shows K♥ T♥ (Pre 61%, Flop 36.3%, Turn 22.7%)
UTG+1 shows J♥ Q♦ (Pre 39%, Flop 63.7%, Turn 77.3%)
UTG+1 wins $825
MP is a very strong reg $100s+ (21/16, 400hs). CO is thinkingreg1 mentioned in earlier hand. Huge MTT winner, top highstakes reg etc. BU is a fish. SB and BB are regs.
I want to try to understand thinkingreg1's thought process here, given the assumption that he presumably believes this is a profitable play. I think it's pretty non-standard play, but I'm not gonna say it's bad b/c that's frankly arrogant given our respective pedigrees.
OTR, it seems CO represents a thin value hand like AJ/KJ/TT vs missed draws or hands like 77. The bet might be ok, but betting turn w/c/t seems more usual?
Thoughts on the whole hand/situation?
