Skip to forum
Notifications
Clear all

100$ T5s

4 Posts
3 Users
0 Reactions
352 Views
kurrkabin
Joined: 12.10.2010

Grabbed by Holdem Manager
NL Holdem $150(BB) Replayer
Hero ($2,030)
BB ($1,780)
UTG ($2,055)
CO ($2,170)
BTN ($965)

Dealt to Hero T♦ 5♦

fold, fold, fold, Hero calls $75, BB checks

FLOP ($300) 6♣ 4♦ 3♠

Hero bets $150, BB calls $150

TURN ($600) 6♣ 4♦ 3♠ 7♠

Hero bets $300, BB calls $300

RIVER ($1,200) 6♣ 4♦ 3♠ 7♠ 5♠

Hero bets $1,430 (AI), BB calls $1,180 (AI)

Villain is a loose passive fish, turn is great obv, but not river. Still we can't c/f riv(I think), so it's better to bet it ourselves and hope maybe that he ever folds a split?


Reply
Quote
3 replies
Tim64
Joined: 03.11.2008

Pre and flop I like. I think we could justify betting turn little bigger since we don't think he folds any thing and he's more likely to be committed on river.

I don't know about river. I'm wondering if checking may be better on basis we don't expect him to ever bluff so if he bets it's either 78/58 or bd flush.

I doubt he's the type to fold a straight on board (even to split) so I think shoving might not have a positive expectation.


Reply
Quote

i agree with tim on river. i doubt he is going to bluff us if we check to him so i would just c/f river.

i think turn sizing is fine, anywhere between 300-400 is good. easy to be results oriented with sizings when the river is so bad


Reply
Quote
Tim64
Joined: 03.11.2008

Originally posted by lessthanthreee
i agree with tim on river. i doubt he is going to bluff us if we check to him so i would just c/f river.

i think turn sizing is fine, anywhere between 300-400 is good. easy to be results oriented with sizings when the river is so bad

Agreed. Also, I misread villain's stack and thought it was an overbet on the riv. :rolleyes:


Reply
Quote