Hi!
Right now im watching following Vid together with a buddy (obv. also PS.com-member) and cause we have some questions, I have decided to start this thread (mb its also interesting for other ppl):
http://de.pokerstrategy.com/video/27968/
Min. 5 - A4s:
As you have already said yourself, we think its a bet OTT..
But as played,
we like your check, but we just do not get get reasoning for your size there?
I mean, wouldn`t it be better to just C/R your whole range inclusive bluffs to like 3,5x or anything?
Here you say alter that you also think a smaller size would have been better, but you still advocate your sizeing regards to the vacuumplay....
But also vacuum-wise, we just do not get your sizeing , cause what shall call this massive overshove?
most FDs are OTT combodraws as well and would likely bet there....
6.45 - 66:
I do getyour underbet-size OTT in term of thatyour airrange is kinda benefiting form it.
But waht is your general size then OTRwith a little over 1:1-SPR?
Do you just slight overjam thenyour bettingrange there?
09.00 - KQo:
at 6max-games i would usually agree with you having a high-frequency cbet-gameplan on this board.
But at Hu ppl defend passively oftentimes like K2s-KJs, K2o-KJo, A2o-A9o; A2s-A9s - those are already ~22%.
Now also all gutters and FDs will not fold...
Like when Hu-player coldcall vs BTN-Minr. on average between 50-60%,
then already bout 33% overall and hence between 66% and 55% of their average passive defendranges are connecting here with this board:
http://imgur.com/AwIw6lw
So Im actually not so sure if this board is a good "Cbet-Board" and if we wanna have a high-freq.-cbet-gameplan, in general... what you think bout it?
and great vid so far btw. ty very much, sir:)