Skip to forum
Notifications
Clear all

nl200 J8s bb vs bu

2 Posts
2 Users
0 Reactions
11 Views
ciachooooo
Joined: 02.01.2010

he plays 23/18, total 3b 6,5%

he doesn't get out of line, have some small read on him, but nothing relevant here

bu open 62%, fold vs 3b 67%, 4b range 7%

cb 66/49/50
b/f flop 54%, b/f turn 37%

wtsd 24/wwsf 45/w$sd 53

1) I guess pre this is easy call
2) do you just x/r flop, as he give up a lot, and than continue on heart turns, x/c 8 or J (or bet them?)
3) or do you x/c flop? is it too optymistic? after flop x/c I think I need to x/r turn without sd value
4) when missed, I think I need to bluff here? how about sizing? If I have a hand I x/r for value on turn, it is good enought to value shove for 1,2x pot, but does it mean I need to shove here, or can I assume, that against average nl200 reg I can bet like 70% pot here and get almost same amount of folds?

$1/$2 No Limit Holdem
4 Players
Hand Conversion Powered by weaktight.com

Stacks:
CO Player1 ($204.55) 102bb
BTN Player2 ($211) 106bb
SB Player3 ($329.66) 165bb
BB ciachooooo ($200) 100bb

Pre-Flop: ($3, 4 players) ciachooooo is BB J♥ 8♥
1 fold, Player2 raises to $4, 1 fold, ciachooooo calls $2

Flop: 4♥ 6♣ 2♦ ($9, 2 players)
ciachooooo checks, Player2 bets $6.41, ciachooooo calls $6.41

Turn: Q♥ ($21.82, 2 players)
ciachooooo checks, Player2 bets $15.54, ciachooooo raises to $45.40, Player2 calls $29.86

River: 7♦ ($112.62, 2 players)
ciachooooo ($144.19)?


Reply
Quote
1 reply
mbml
Joined: 27.11.2008

hi

1. Yes
2. Hmm I think it could be viable but it would help if you do take this line sometimes with 88/77/A6 type of hands, especially if he picks up on the fact that you are polarized and starts 3bet bluffing or floating wide
3. I think c/c is gonna be close, it's fine to have 2 overs + backdoors. If villain is even more aggro then I would often just opt for a fold here. you should have stronger hands (K high and A high) to c/c this flop with.
4. I think your turn size is too small. Just raise it up to 55-60 and push the River


Reply
Quote