Skip to forum
Notifications
Clear all

Sh50 - Tp + Oesd

2 Posts
2 Users
0 Reactions
102 Views

BB: 64/15

€0.25/€0.50 No Limit Holdem
HEM2
5 Players
Hand Conversion Powered by weaktight.com

Stacks:
UTG (€54.08) 108bb
hero (CO) (€54.80) 110bb
BTN (€80.19) 160bb
SB (€50) 100bb
BB (€49.96) 100bb

Pre-Flop: (€0.75, 5 players) hero is CO 6♠ 7♠
1 fold, hero raises to €1.43, BTN calls €1.43, 1 fold, BB calls €0.93

BU has a small coldcall range, maybe a little bit bigger because of the fishy bb.
But he should have mostly pockets + strong broadways

Flop: 5♥ 7♣ 4♠ (€4.54, 3 players)
BB checks, hero bets €3, BTN raises to €9, BB folds, hero folds

I don't have a big samplesize on his raise cbet stat + we are in a 3way pot.
Don't know if he would raise overpairs like this since his range is capped and mine isn't.
I thought a call oop is no valid option so i either fold or ship right away.

Final Pot: €4.28


Reply
Quote
1 reply
EmanuelC16
Joined: 02.01.2010

Hi C,

After 400 hands he seems quite aggressive postflop. He raised some cbets, he doesn't fold too much to cbet plus his AFq is high on all streets.

Your concern for postflop is definitely valid but given your equity and opponent being far from tight and honest I think 3betting and calling it off is the way to go. I would 3bet big enough to be pot commited but not shove so something like 3betting to 23 I think should be fine.

Complete worst scenario where you 3bet and he only shoves sets is:


Board: 7♣5♥4♠
       Equity     Win     Tie
UTG    29.19%  27.98%   1.21% { 7s6s }
UTG+1  70.81%  69.60%   1.21% { 77, 55-44 }

A more likely scenario:


Board: 7♣5♥4♠
       Equity     Win     Tie
UTG    41.29%  40.07%   1.21% { 7s6s }
UTG+1  58.71%  57.50%   1.21% { JJ-TT, 77, 55-44 }

And finally, one of the best cases for you:


Board: 7♣5♥4♠
       Equity     Win     Tie
UTG    46.60%  41.66%   4.93% { 7s6s }
UTG+1  53.40%  48.47%   4.93% { JJ-44, 75s+, 65s, 54s }

As you can see, getting it in, when you have folding equity with your 3bet, will be +EV in most cases.


Reply
Quote