Skip to forum
Notifications
Clear all

$5 6max BvB

2 Posts
2 Users
0 Reactions
236 Views
makryxeris
Joined: 19.01.2011

Hi, i dont like my line here and i want a second opinion. Is better just to complete? What about the rest line?
Villain is loose passive in small sample

Pacific, $5 Buy-in (25/50 blinds) No Limit Hold'em Tournament, 5 Players
Poker Tools Powered By Holdem Manager - The Ultimate Poker Software Suite.

BTN: 1,680 (33.6 bb)
Hero (SB): 1,435 (28.7 bb)
BB: 1,315 (26.3 bb)
MP: 1,540 (30.8 bb)
CO: 3,030 (60.6 bb)

Preflop: Hero is SB with T 9
3 folds, Hero raises to 118, BB calls 68

Flop: (236) K J 2 (2 players)
Hero bets 118, BB calls 118

Turn: (472) 7 (2 players)
Hero checks, BB bets 200, Hero folds

Results:

Spoiler

472 pot
Final Board: K J 2 7
Hero mucked T 9 and lost (-236 net)
BB mucked and won 472 (236 net)


Reply
Quote
1 reply
chenny8888
Joined: 03.10.2007

Hi all,

I like raising vs most opponents. If villain is very passive I don't mind a complete, but if he's <50% VPIP or so from the BB vs a SB raise (it's hard to quantify this, better to just do it by feeling), then a raise is generally better.

Postflop: Vs a loose passive opponent I don't like firing away too much. However on the turn we pick up a double belly buster. This is a bit too much equity + implied odds for me to pass up, so I would fire again. Because it's a card that doesn't appear too scary, I don't expect many folds. Consequently, I'd put out a blocking bet of around 1/3 pot or 160.

We can then bomb the rivers we hit, and fire a very small (again 1/4-1/3 pot or so) river bet if we miss the river, hoping to fold out his draws.


Reply
Quote